[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/7] virtio-net: Filter cleanup/improvements
From: |
Mark McLoughlin |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/7] virtio-net: Filter cleanup/improvements |
Date: |
Fri, 12 Jun 2009 18:07:54 +0100 |
On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 16:21 +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 04:55:10 am Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> > Hi Alex,
> >
> > On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 14:46 -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > > This series cleans up a few things around packet filtering. I've
> > > probably gone a little overboard on breaking up patches, if we want to
> > > avoid bumping the save version_id so much, these could be mostly lumped
> > > together. The main features here are more efficient handling of the
> > > filtering between unicast and multicast, better overflow tracking, adding
> > > more RX modes, and increasing the size of the filter table and control
> > > queue depth.
> >
> > The whole series looks good to me. Please make sure to send Rusty a
> > patch with the VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_RX_EXTRA etc. header additions.
>
> Remain unconvinced that it's worth a feature bit. It'd pretty obscure (hell,
> even multicast is pretty obscure IRL).
Yeah, we probably don't need the feature bit - the guest can just handle
a VIRTIO_NET_ERR status if the host doesn't implement it.
Alex - if you agree, could you post a qemu patch to kill the
CTRL_RX_EXTRA feature? And also post a linux/virtio_net.h patch to add
the new rx modes?
Thanks,
Mark.
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 6/7] virtio-net: Add new RX filter controls, (continued)