qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] qemu: make virtio-blk PCI compliant by default


From: Rusty Russell
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] qemu: make virtio-blk PCI compliant by default
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 14:36:38 +0930
User-agent: KMail/1.11.2 (Linux/2.6.28-15-generic; KDE/4.2.2; i686; ; )

On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 09:09:59 pm Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 03:40:08AM -0400, john cooper wrote:
> > Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > commit bf011293faaa7f87e4de83185931e7411b794128 made virtio-blk-pci not
> > > PCI-compliant, since it makes region 0 (which is an i/o region)
> > > size > 256, and, since PCI 2.1, i/o regions are limited to 256 bytes size.
> > > 
> > > When the ATA serial number feature is off, which is the default,
> > > make the device spec compliant again, by making region 0 smaller.
> > 
> > I'd hazard this is the cause of the breakage others
> > encountered -- even when the driver was initialized
> > but unused.  For some odd reason I hadn't seen nor
> > been able to reproduce the failure.
> > 
> > The mock-up of an entire ATA IDENTIFY page is really
> > overkill for what we're trying to accomplish here,
> > namely passing a 20 byte S/N from qemu to the guest.
> > However emulating and passing an IDENTIFY page allows
> > guest apps to interpret the information via an
> > existing interface, with the guest driver doing nothing
> > more than transferring the data as opaque.  During
> > review, other defined fields of the IDENTIFY page were
> > speculated to be potentially useful thus the entire
> > 512 byte page was passed wholesale.  But it is clearly
> > more trouble than benefit at this point.  I'll rework
> > the patch or use an alternate mechanism.
> > 
> > -john
> 
> For now, what my patch does is fix the PCI compliance issue for everyone
> who uses the default setup (without the serial #). With serial disabled,
> we should not reserve any space in region 0 (not even 20 bytes).
> 
> So I propose we apply this patch for now, and then your patch only has
> to handle the case of serial number enabled. Makes sense?  If yes pls
> ack.

lguest uses the same workaround (since we don't support that feature anyway
at the moment).

Thanks!
Rusty.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]