[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] Unclear committer situation
From: |
Aurelien Jarno |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] Unclear committer situation |
Date: |
Wed, 2 Dec 2009 09:26:12 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 12:47:36PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could someone with commit rights please stand up to feel responsible for
> PPC?
>
> Usually, when I send a patch to qemu-devel, I know who to address to
> increase chances of it getting committed. For kvm/vnc/block I just CC
> Anthony, for Audio I just CC malc, etc.
>
> There are some subsystems where nobody feels responsible though,
> apparently hoping 'someone else' will tske on it. Well, turns out it
> doesn't work that way.
>
> So could we please assign a committer for every subsystem around? Even
> if the committer doesn't know the architecture inside out, it's still
> valuable to have soneone feel responsible at all. Committer and
> maintainer also don't have to be the same person. I'll gladly maintain
> S390 without having commit rights - as long as I have someone to CC and
> know the patches will get merged.
>
I also try to follow the ppc architecture, though less than mips and
also depending on my free time. I know that Blue Swirl and Malc also
care about it.
It's not impossible that I miss patches given the current patches rate
on the mailing list, so don't hesitate to Cc: me. On the other hand, I
don't really feel comfortable with KVM related patches, I would prefer
to see them committed by Anthony.
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
address@hidden http://www.aurel32.net
Re: [Qemu-devel] Unclear committer situation,
Aurelien Jarno <=
Re: [Qemu-devel] Unclear committer situation, Avi Kivity, 2009/12/02
Re: [Qemu-devel] Unclear committer situation, malc, 2009/12/02
Re: [Qemu-devel] Unclear committer situation, Artyom Tarasenko, 2009/12/02