qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Qemu-devel] Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] virtio-console: Move to qdev, multiple


From: Amit Shah
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] virtio-console: Move to qdev, multiple devices, generic ports
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 16:17:41 +0530
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05)

On (Thu) Dec 24 2009 [11:26:00], Alexander Graf wrote:
> 
> On 23.12.2009, at 20:52, Amit Shah wrote:
> 
> > Hello,
> > 
> > This series splits up the patches by functionality. Note, however,
> > that patches 2-6 introduce some functionality that's advertised to the
> > guest as having to work all at once or not at all. Also, the savevm
> > version is bumped only once but save/restore state is added in each of
> > the patches. They are split only for easier reviewability.
> > 
> > There are a few differences from yesterday's posting: comments from
> > Markus have been addressed and also some issues that were pending have
> > been resolved.
> > 
> > There's still a couple of fixmes:
> > - The vl.c bits aren't right yet (need to accomodate s390).
> > - Locking isn't perfect, a few extra locks are needed, but it doesn't
> >  matter as long as qemu doesn't run it all separately (I've tested
> >  with the kvm tree with -smp 2 as well and it runs fine).
> 
>   CC    s390x-softmmu/s390-virtio-bus.o
>   CC    s390x-softmmu/s390-virtio.o
> /tmp/qemu/hw/s390-virtio.c:29:31: error: hw/virtio-console.h: No such file or 
> directory
> make[1]: *** [s390-virtio.o] Error 1
> make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> make: *** [subdir-s390x-softmmu] Error 2
> 
> 
> You should be able to at least compile test it for S390 with ./configure 
> --target-list=s390x-softmmu. Linking should fail afterwards, but errors like 
> this should be rather easy to spot that way :-)

OK; after replacing that virtio-console.h with virtio-serial.h, it does
compile fine. Though there's a link error later for something else.

So I guess it should work after this change.

                Amit




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]