qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] Clean-up a little bit the RW related


From: Jamie Lokier
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] Clean-up a little bit the RW related bits of BDRV_O_FLAGS. BDRV_O_RDONLY gone (and so is BDRV_O_ACCESS). Default value for bdrv_flags (0/zero) is READ-ONLY. Need to explicitly request READ-WRITE.
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 13:37:13 +0000
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)

Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 08:26:56AM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> > Jamie Lokier <address@hidden> writes:
> > 
> > > Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > >> On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 11:34:59AM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> > >> > BDRV_O_RDWR is a flag, just like BDRV_SNAPSHOT.  We don't have
> > >> > BDRV_DONT_SNAPSHOT, either.
> > >> 
> > >> Well, this just mirros the file access macros: we have RDONLY, WRONLY
> > >> and RDRW. I assume this similarity is just historical?
> > >
> > > To avoid confusion, why don't we just call the flag BDRV_O_WRITABLE.
> > > Then it's obvious what clearing that flag means.
> > 
> > Sounds good to me.
> 
> Won't it be confused with WRONLY?

No, because nobody sane would expect qemu's blockdevs to need WRONLY :-)

-- Jamie




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]