[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Qemu-devel] Re: Fun with sparc (was Re: qemu-ppc can't run static uClib
From: |
Artyom Tarasenko |
Subject: |
[Qemu-devel] Re: Fun with sparc (was Re: qemu-ppc can't run static uClibc binaries.) |
Date: |
Sat, 20 Feb 2010 22:59:38 +0100 |
2010/2/20 Rob Landley <address@hidden>:
> On Saturday 20 February 2010 11:34:44 Blue Swirl wrote:
>> On 2/20/10, Rob Landley <address@hidden> wrote:
>> > I don't understand what's going wrong here. Did the kernel break on
>> > sparc sometime between 2.6.18 and 2.6.32 and nobody noticed? Is sparc
>> > using software emulated floating point at the kernel level and that's
>> > configured as a module? (Except I don't think busybox ls uses floating
>> > point...)
>>
>> Sparc32 is not maintained anymore so maybe it broke at some point.
>> There was some discussion a few years ago.
>
> Not maintained on the Linux kernel side, or not maintained under qemu? It
> seems to be working under debian, but the 2.6.18 kernel is from 2006.
>
>> > Do any sparc people understand what's going on here? My next step is to
>> > grab a 2.6.18 kernel and try to get _that_ to work with the tweaked
>> > debian config (and an ext2 root filesystem since squashfs wasn't merged
>> > back then and had a format change when it was merged). But I'm mostly
>> > flailing around blind here...
>>
>> I'm also trying different kernels using my .config. But already 2.6.12
>> hangs in ESP probe.
>
> I've got 2.6.32 booting to a command prompt (albeit with serial console and
> intentionall restricted set of hardware). But then it misbehaves.
>
> I'll try getting 2.6.18 to build with a known .config, and then bisect forward
> if that seems to work...
You can also try aurora linux. They had a bit newer kernel. Don't know
how stable is it on a real hw though.
--
Regards,
Artyom Tarasenko
solaris/sparc under qemu blog: http://tyom.blogspot.com/
- [Qemu-devel] Fun with sparc (was Re: qemu-ppc can't run static uClibc binaries.), (continued)
- [Qemu-devel] Fun with sparc (was Re: qemu-ppc can't run static uClibc binaries.), Rob Landley, 2010/02/20
- [Qemu-devel] Re: Fun with sparc (was Re: qemu-ppc can't run static uClibc binaries.), Blue Swirl, 2010/02/20
- [Qemu-devel] Re: Fun with sparc (was Re: qemu-ppc can't run static uClibc binaries.), Rob Landley, 2010/02/20
- [Qemu-devel] Re: Fun with sparc (was Re: qemu-ppc can't run static uClibc binaries.), Blue Swirl, 2010/02/20
- [Qemu-devel] Re: Fun with sparc (was Re: qemu-ppc can't run static uClibc binaries.), Rob Landley, 2010/02/20
- [Qemu-devel] Commit 085219f79cad broke Sparc-32 back in 2.6.28., Rob Landley, 2010/02/21
- [Qemu-devel] Re: Commit 085219f79cad broke Sparc-32 back in 2.6.28., David Miller, 2010/02/22
- [Qemu-devel] Re: Commit 085219f79cad broke Sparc-32 back in 2.6.28., Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz, 2010/02/22
- [Qemu-devel] Re: Commit 085219f79cad broke Sparc-32 back in 2.6.28., Rob Landley, 2010/02/21
- [Qemu-devel] Re: Commit 085219f79cad broke Sparc-32 back in 2.6.28., David Miller, 2010/02/22
- [Qemu-devel] Re: Fun with sparc (was Re: qemu-ppc can't run static uClibc binaries.),
Artyom Tarasenko <=
- [Qemu-devel] Re: Fun with sparc (was Re: qemu-ppc can't run static uClibc binaries.), Artyom Tarasenko, 2010/02/20
- [Qemu-devel] Re: Fun with sparc (was Re: qemu-ppc can't run static uClibc binaries.), Blue Swirl, 2010/02/20
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: qemu-ppc can't run static uClibc binaries., Rob Landley, 2010/02/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu-ppc can't run static uClibc binaries., Alexander Graf, 2010/02/15
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu-ppc can't run static uClibc binaries., Rob Landley, 2010/02/16
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu-ppc can't run static uClibc binaries., Alexander Graf, 2010/02/16
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu-ppc can't run static uClibc binaries., Rob Landley, 2010/02/16
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu-ppc can't run static uClibc binaries., Stuart Brady, 2010/02/16
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu-ppc can't run static uClibc binaries., Aurelien Jarno, 2010/02/28