[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] Significant performance regression in qemu-system-mips.
From: |
Rob Landley |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] Significant performance regression in qemu-system-mips. |
Date: |
Sun, 28 Mar 2010 13:40:34 -0500 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.11.2 (Linux/2.6.28-18-generic; KDE/4.2.2; x86_64; ; ) |
On Sunday 28 March 2010 09:57:09 Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > If you want the code actually cleaned up instead of minimally changed,
> > here's a stab at that. (Unfortunately I haven't got a ppc64 setup to
> > test it with yet, but ppc32 still works.)
>
> Not necessarily a code cleanup, but at least a patch which doesn't
> introduce useless changes. Anyway applied.
The original change was to eliminate an "unused variable pos" warning when the
BSD code was #ifdefed out.
Yay applied. Thanks,
Rob
--
Latency is more important than throughput. It's that simple. - Linus Torvalds
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Significant performance regression in qemu-system-mips., (continued)
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Significant performance regression in qemu-system-mips., Rob Landley, 2010/03/25
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Significant performance regression in qemu-system-mips., Rob Landley, 2010/03/26
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Significant performance regression in qemu-system-mips., Aurelien Jarno, 2010/03/26
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Significant performance regression in qemu-system-mips., Rob Landley, 2010/03/26
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Significant performance regression in qemu-system-mips., Aurelien Jarno, 2010/03/27
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Significant performance regression in qemu-system-mips., Rob Landley, 2010/03/27
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Significant performance regression in qemu-system-mips., Aurelien Jarno, 2010/03/28
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Significant performance regression in qemu-system-mips.,
Rob Landley <=
[Qemu-devel] Re: Significant performance regression in qemu-system-mips., Paolo Bonzini, 2010/03/28