[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qemu: address todo comment in exec.c
From: |
Aurelien Jarno |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qemu: address todo comment in exec.c |
Date: |
Sat, 10 Apr 2010 00:33:53 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 02:18:19PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> exec.c has a comment 'XXX: optimize' for lduw_phys/stw_phys,
> so let's do it, along the lines of stl_phys.
>
> The reason to address 16 bit accesses specifically is that virtio relies
> on these accesses to be done atomically, using memset as we do now
> breaks this assumption, which is reported to cause qemu with kvm
> to read wrong index values under stress.
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525323
The patch looks ok in principle, but I am worried by the fact it is
mostly a copy and paste of ldl_phys() and stl_phys(). Wouldn't it be
possible to factorize the code a bit, maybe using macros?
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <address@hidden>
> ---
> exec.c | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/exec.c b/exec.c
> index 33854e1..262c255 100644
> --- a/exec.c
> +++ b/exec.c
> @@ -3788,12 +3788,36 @@ uint32_t ldub_phys(target_phys_addr_t addr)
> return val;
> }
>
> -/* XXX: optimize */
> +/* warning: addr must be aligned */
> uint32_t lduw_phys(target_phys_addr_t addr)
> {
> - uint16_t val;
> - cpu_physical_memory_read(addr, (uint8_t *)&val, 2);
> - return tswap16(val);
> + int io_index;
> + uint8_t *ptr;
> + uint64_t val;
> + unsigned long pd;
> + PhysPageDesc *p;
> +
> + p = phys_page_find(addr >> TARGET_PAGE_BITS);
> + if (!p) {
> + pd = IO_MEM_UNASSIGNED;
> + } else {
> + pd = p->phys_offset;
> + }
> +
> + if ((pd & ~TARGET_PAGE_MASK) > IO_MEM_ROM &&
> + !(pd & IO_MEM_ROMD)) {
> + /* I/O case */
> + io_index = (pd >> IO_MEM_SHIFT) & (IO_MEM_NB_ENTRIES - 1);
> + if (p)
> + addr = (addr & ~TARGET_PAGE_MASK) + p->region_offset;
> + val = io_mem_read[io_index][1](io_mem_opaque[io_index], addr);
> + } else {
> + /* RAM case */
> + ptr = phys_ram_base + (pd & TARGET_PAGE_MASK) +
> + (addr & ~TARGET_PAGE_MASK);
> + val = lduw_p(ptr);
> + }
> + return val;
> }
>
> /* warning: addr must be aligned. The ram page is not masked as dirty
> @@ -3910,11 +3934,40 @@ void stb_phys(target_phys_addr_t addr, uint32_t val)
> cpu_physical_memory_write(addr, &v, 1);
> }
>
> -/* XXX: optimize */
> +/* warning: addr must be aligned */
> void stw_phys(target_phys_addr_t addr, uint32_t val)
> {
> - uint16_t v = tswap16(val);
> - cpu_physical_memory_write(addr, (const uint8_t *)&v, 2);
> + int io_index;
> + uint8_t *ptr;
> + unsigned long pd;
> + PhysPageDesc *p;
> +
> + p = phys_page_find(addr >> TARGET_PAGE_BITS);
> + if (!p) {
> + pd = IO_MEM_UNASSIGNED;
> + } else {
> + pd = p->phys_offset;
> + }
> +
> + if ((pd & ~TARGET_PAGE_MASK) != IO_MEM_RAM) {
> + io_index = (pd >> IO_MEM_SHIFT) & (IO_MEM_NB_ENTRIES - 1);
> + if (p)
> + addr = (addr & ~TARGET_PAGE_MASK) + p->region_offset;
> + io_mem_write[io_index][1](io_mem_opaque[io_index], addr, val);
> + } else {
> + unsigned long addr1;
> + addr1 = (pd & TARGET_PAGE_MASK) + (addr & ~TARGET_PAGE_MASK);
> + /* RAM case */
> + ptr = phys_ram_base + addr1;
> + stw_p(ptr, val);
> + if (!cpu_physical_memory_is_dirty(addr1)) {
> + /* invalidate code */
> + tb_invalidate_phys_page_range(addr1, addr1 + 2, 0);
> + /* set dirty bit */
> + phys_ram_dirty[addr1 >> TARGET_PAGE_BITS] |=
> + (0xff & ~CODE_DIRTY_FLAG);
> + }
> + }
> }
>
> /* XXX: optimize */
> --
> 1.7.0.2.280.gc6f05
>
>
>
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
address@hidden http://www.aurel32.net