qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] virtio-spec: document block CMD and FLUSH


From: Christoph Hellwig
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] virtio-spec: document block CMD and FLUSH
Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 20:54:59 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i

On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 12:22:20AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> I took a stub at documenting CMD and FLUSH request types in virtio
> block.  Christoph, could you look over this please?
> 
> I note that the interface seems full of warts to me,
> this might be a first step to cleaning them.

The whole virtio-blk interface is full of warts.  It has been
extended rather ad-hoc, so that is rather expected.

> One issue I struggled with especially is how type
> field mixes bits and non-bit values. I ended up
> simply defining all legal values, so that we have
> CMD = 2, CMD_OUT = 3 and so on.

It's basically a complete mess without much logic behind it.

> +\change_unchanged
> +the high bit
> +\change_inserted 0 1266497301
> + (VIRTIO_BLK_T_BARRIER)
> +\change_unchanged
> + indicates that this request acts as a barrier and that all preceeding 
> requests
> + must be complete before this one, and all following requests must not be
> + started until this is complete.
> +
> +\change_inserted 0 1266504385
> + Note that a barrier does not flush caches in the underlying backend device
> + in host, and thus does not serve as data consistency guarantee.
> + Driver must use FLUSH request to flush the host cache.
> +\change_unchanged

I'm not sure it's even worth documenting it.  I can't see any way to
actually implement safe behaviour with the VIRTIO_BLK_T_BARRIER-style
barriers.


Btw, did I mention that .lyx is a a really horrible format to review
diffs for?  Plain latex would be a lot better..




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]