[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] APIC/IOAPIC cleanup
From: |
Jan Kiszka |
Subject: |
[Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] APIC/IOAPIC cleanup |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Aug 2010 11:09:18 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); de; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080226 SUSE/2.0.0.12-1.1 Thunderbird/2.0.0.12 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 |
Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 08/23/2010 12:06 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> On 08/22/2010 03:33 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>> On 08/22/2010 11:03 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>>> On 08/22/2010 02:44 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>>>>> No more MI diamond and all devices have DeviceStates.
>>>>>> Coincidentally, it matches more closely how hardware works..
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Well, I agree, but I honestly lost the context. How does this
>>>>> relate to the APIC and cpu hotplug?
>>>>
>>>> My original assertion was that the local APIC is not a DeviceState,
>>>> but rather it's a CPU feature.
>>>>
>>>> If you look at some of the magic that apic.c has to do in the IO
>>>> callbacks, it should be clear that it's special.
>>>
>>> It's special in that it is connected to a cpu core. So's the RTL8139
>>> device, on one hand connected to a PCI bus, on the other hand
>>> connected to a PHY (netdev in qemu).
>>>
>>>> In the not too distant future, I'd like to move apic.c to
>>>> target-i386. There should be no need to explicitly instantiate it
>>>> when you instantiate a CPU.
>>>
>>> But then there's a need explicitly not to instantiate it when using
>>> -isapc.
>>
>> No. isapc has nothing to do with whether a CPU has a local APIC.
>>
>> You don't instantiate the local APIC if you create a 486 CPU. If you
>> create an isapc with a pentium processor, it's going to have a local
>> APIC although it's irrelevant as it's fully compatible with the 486.
>>
>
> Okay, okay. "But then there's a need explicitly not to instantiate it
> when modelling a 486 or lower".
...plus the need to instantiate it (as a dedicated device) when modeling
486 SMP.
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/7] APIC/IOAPIC cleanup, (continued)
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/7] APIC/IOAPIC cleanup, Avi Kivity, 2010/08/24
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/7] APIC/IOAPIC cleanup, Blue Swirl, 2010/08/20
- [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] APIC/IOAPIC cleanup, Jan Kiszka, 2010/08/20
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/7] APIC/IOAPIC cleanup, Avi Kivity, 2010/08/22
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/7] APIC/IOAPIC cleanup, Anthony Liguori, 2010/08/22
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/7] APIC/IOAPIC cleanup, Avi Kivity, 2010/08/22
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/7] APIC/IOAPIC cleanup, Anthony Liguori, 2010/08/22
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/7] APIC/IOAPIC cleanup, Avi Kivity, 2010/08/22
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/7] APIC/IOAPIC cleanup, Anthony Liguori, 2010/08/22
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/7] APIC/IOAPIC cleanup, Avi Kivity, 2010/08/23
- [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] APIC/IOAPIC cleanup,
Jan Kiszka <=
- [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] APIC/IOAPIC cleanup, Avi Kivity, 2010/08/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] APIC/IOAPIC cleanup, Alexander Graf, 2010/08/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] APIC/IOAPIC cleanup, Avi Kivity, 2010/08/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] APIC/IOAPIC cleanup, Alexander Graf, 2010/08/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] APIC/IOAPIC cleanup, Avi Kivity, 2010/08/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/7] APIC/IOAPIC cleanup, Anthony Liguori, 2010/08/22
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/7] APIC/IOAPIC cleanup, Avi Kivity, 2010/08/23
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/7] APIC/IOAPIC cleanup, Avi Kivity, 2010/08/22