[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [RFC][STABLE 0.13] Revert "qcow2: Use bdrv_(p)write

From: Avi Kivity
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [RFC][STABLE 0.13] Revert "qcow2: Use bdrv_(p)write_sync for metadata writes"
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 15:18:05 +0300
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv: Gecko/20100720 Fedora/3.1.1-1.fc13 Lightning/1.0b2pre Thunderbird/3.1.1

 On 08/24/2010 03:12 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:

Well, safety is not boolean. Considering to make it mostly safe instead
of completely safe because of the performance doesn't mean that we
should make it completely unsafe.

What is safety then? A vague feeling of "oh today is monday so my data
is safe, but on tuesday I always lose my image data"? Either we promise
to keep data safe or we don't. There is no in between.

Do you drive a car?

Though in general I agree we shouldn't compromise on data integrity.

error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]