|
From: | Avi Kivity |
Subject: | Re: [Qemu-devel] Unmaintained QEMU builds |
Date: | Sun, 05 Sep 2010 20:51:34 +0300 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100806 Fedora/3.1.2-1.fc13 Thunderbird/3.1.2 |
On 09/05/2010 08:44 PM, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
I'm perfectly fine with dropping it. btw, there are other features in qemu that seem to be academic exercises - *-user for example. What is it useful for? Most open source stuff is multiplatform, and serious commercial work needs something faster than tcg.Riiight.. Here's a story, my work duties required me to fiddled withMore examples of industrial use are Nokia and Palm using OpenEmbedded building firmware for their phones, which afaik I relies for some parts on qemu (just some parts, so the tcg performance doesn't impact overall performance that much). There are many more users of OE, but these two have products in shops near me.
Well, both these examples are very far from the typical end user or even typical developer.
No doubt anything is useful for someone, given the are 6.7Gp of us on this planet.
Are those examples worth the effort? I don't know, but I'm sceptical. -- I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this signature is too narrow to contain.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |