[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Qemu-devel] Re: Which qemu ports actually work?

From: Stefan Weil
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: Which qemu ports actually work?
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 22:54:20 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv: Gecko/20100913 Iceowl/1.0b1 Icedove/3.0.7

Am 26.10.2010 22:07, schrieb Torbjorn Granlund:
Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden> writes:

On 10/26/2010 09:12 PM, Torbjorn Granlund wrote:
> FreeBSD 8.1-p1 x86_64 (the CPU is AMD Phenom X6).
> I use the kqemu kernel module. All software (kernel, /usr/ports) are
> up-to-date as of yesterday.

I suggest that you use a newer version, even though kqemu support has
been removed there.

Newer version of what? FreeBSD 8.1-RELENG updated yesterday, and a
ports tree from yesterday, are new in my world!

Or do you mean to use FreeBSD CURRENT? That's not an alternative for
me, I am running on production machines. (And if kqemu is gone, that's
not an improvement...)

No, you need newer version of qemu, for example version 0.13.0
(see http://wiki.qemu.org/Main_Page) or latest qemu version
from the qemu git repository.

kqemu was replaced by kvm support (at least for some platforms).

As far as I know, there should be kvm support for FreeBSD, too,
but I must admit that I rarely use kvm: for most guests
which you listed neither kqemu nor kvm will be useable.
Both only improve host architecture = guest architecture

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]