qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCHv2 7/8] Change pci bus get_dev_path callback to p


From: Gleb Natapov
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCHv2 7/8] Change pci bus get_dev_path callback to print only slot and func
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 20:22:53 +0200

On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 08:12:55PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 07:29:50PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 07:17:37PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 01:40:08PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > > > Domain should be determined form parent bus and bus number is configured
> > > > by guest and should not be used in qemu internally.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov <address@hidden>
> > > > ---
> > > >  hw/pci.c |   11 ++++++-----
> > > >  1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/hw/pci.c b/hw/pci.c
> > > > index 92aaa85..1c5706f 100644
> > > > --- a/hw/pci.c
> > > > +++ b/hw/pci.c
> > > > @@ -2138,12 +2138,13 @@ static void pcibus_dev_print(Monitor *mon, 
> > > > DeviceState *dev, int indent)
> > > >  static char *pcibus_get_dev_path(DeviceState *dev)
> > > >  {
> > > >      PCIDevice *d = (PCIDevice *)dev;
> > > > -    char path[16];
> > > > -
> > > > -    snprintf(path, sizeof(path), "%04x:%02x:%02x.%x",
> > > > -             pci_find_domain(d->bus), d->config[PCI_SECONDARY_BUS],
> > > > -             PCI_SLOT(d->devfn), PCI_FUNC(d->devfn));
> > > > +    char path[50];
> > > > +    int off;
> > > >  
> > > > +    off = snprintf(path, sizeof(path), "address@hidden", 
> > > > qdev_driver_name(dev),
> > > > +             PCI_SLOT(d->devfn));
> > > > +    if (PCI_FUNC(d->devfn))
> > > > +        snprintf(path + off, sizeof(path) + off, ",%x", 
> > > > PCI_FUNC(d->devfn));
> > > >      return strdup(path);
> > > >  }
> > > 
> > > Can we change separators to be : and . instead of @ and , please?
> > No. I am implementing well defined Open Firmware device path. Lets stop
> > reinventing things wrongly please?
> > 
> > > This will make it compatible with existing code and generally
> > > what users expect.
> > > 
> > It will drop domain and bus number part anyway.
> 
> Yes but most users at the moment have domain and bus 0 only.
> So even simply adding 0000:00 prefix will work.
> 
Are we trying to build device path or do bunch of hacks? We already have
hack now. Why change anything at all? PPC Macs  (G500) had 3 pci buses.

--
                        Gleb.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]