[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/21] Kemari for KVM 0.2
From: |
Stefan Hajnoczi |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/21] Kemari for KVM 0.2 |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Nov 2010 16:23:53 +0000 |
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Yoshiaki Tamura
<address@hidden> wrote:
> 2010/11/29 Paul Brook <address@hidden>:
>>> > If devices incorrectly claim support for live migration, then that should
>>> > also be fixed, either by removing the broken code or by making it work.
>>>
>>> I totally agree with you.
>>>
>>> > AFAICT your current proposal is just feeding back the results of some
>>> > fairly specific QA testing. I'd rather not get into that game. The
>>> > correct response in the context of upstream development is to file a bug
>>> > and/or fix the code. We already have config files that allow third party
>>> > packagers to remove devices they don't want to support.
>>>
>>> Sorry, I didn't get what you're trying to tell me. My plan would
>>> be to initially start from a subset of devices, and gradually
>>> grow the number of devices that Kemari works with. While this
>>> process, it'll include what you said above, file a but and/or fix
>>> the code. Am I missing what you're saying?
>>
>> My point is that the whitelist shouldn't exist at all. Devices either
>> support
>> migration or they don't. Having some sort of separate whitelist is the wrong
>> way to determine which devices support migration.
>
> Alright!
>
> Then if a user encounters a problem with Kemari, we'll fix Kemari
> or the devices or both. Correct?
Is this a fair summary: any device that supports live migration workw
under Kemari?
(If such a device does not work under Kemari then this is a bug that
needs to be fixed in live migration, Kemari, or the device.)
Stefan
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/21] Kemari for KVM 0.2, (continued)
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/21] Kemari for KVM 0.2, Stefan Hajnoczi, 2010/11/29
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/21] Kemari for KVM 0.2, Paul Brook, 2010/11/29
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/21] Kemari for KVM 0.2, Yoshiaki Tamura, 2010/11/29
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/21] Kemari for KVM 0.2, Paul Brook, 2010/11/29
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/21] Kemari for KVM 0.2, Yoshiaki Tamura, 2010/11/29
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/21] Kemari for KVM 0.2, Paul Brook, 2010/11/29
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/21] Kemari for KVM 0.2, Yoshiaki Tamura, 2010/11/29
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/21] Kemari for KVM 0.2, Paul Brook, 2010/11/29
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/21] Kemari for KVM 0.2, Yoshiaki Tamura, 2010/11/29
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/21] Kemari for KVM 0.2, Paul Brook, 2010/11/29
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/21] Kemari for KVM 0.2,
Stefan Hajnoczi <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/21] Kemari for KVM 0.2, Dor Laor, 2010/11/29
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/21] Kemari for KVM 0.2, Paul Brook, 2010/11/29
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/21] Kemari for KVM 0.2, Anthony Liguori, 2010/11/29
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/21] Kemari for KVM 0.2, Paul Brook, 2010/11/29
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/21] Kemari for KVM 0.2, Anthony Liguori, 2010/11/29
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/21] Kemari for KVM 0.2, Paul Brook, 2010/11/27
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/21] Kemari for KVM 0.2, Yoshiaki Tamura, 2010/11/27