qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH][STABLE-0.14] vnc: tight: Fix crash after 2GB of out


From: Michael Tokarev
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH][STABLE-0.14] vnc: tight: Fix crash after 2GB of output
Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2011 08:56:01 +0300
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20101227 Icedove/3.0.11

05.03.2011 00:08, Corentin Chary wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Michael Tokarev <address@hidden> wrote:
[]
>> The attached slightly different patch fixes both places and fixes
>> them for good (hopefully anyway).  Runtime-tested for the tight
>> case, but honestly, I didn't wait for 2G of output ;)
>>
> Could you re-send it inline (not as an attachment), and CC Anthony ?

What's wrong with using an attachment?  The whole email can be
fed into patch(1) (or git-am, whatever) and either will do the
job.  But here it goes, anyway, with one possible caveat - I'm
not sure anymore it will apply, since now I used cut-n-paste.

/mjt

----

fix 2Gb integer overflow in in VNC tight and zlib encodings

As found by Roland Dreier <address@hidden> (excellent
catch!), when amount of VNC compressed data produced by zlib
and sent to client exceeds 2Gb, integer overflow occurs because
currently, we calculate amount of data produced at each step by
comparing saved total_out with new total_out, and total_out is
something which grows without bounds.  Compare it with previous
avail_out instead of total_out, and leave total_out alone.

The same code is used in vnc-enc-tight.c and vnc-enc-zlib.c,
so fix both cases.

There, there's no actual need to save previous_out value, since
capacity-offset (which is how that value is calculated) stays
the same so it can be recalculated again after call to deflate(),
but whole thing becomes less readable this way.

Reported-by: Roland Dreier <address@hidden>
Signed-off-by: Michael Tokarev <address@hidden>

diff --git a/ui/vnc-enc-tight.c b/ui/vnc-enc-tight.c
index 2522936..87fdf35 100644
--- a/ui/vnc-enc-tight.c
+++ b/ui/vnc-enc-tight.c
@@ -868,8 +868,8 @@ static int tight_compress_data(VncState *vs, int stream_id, 
size_t bytes,
     zstream->avail_in = vs->tight.tight.offset;
     zstream->next_out = vs->tight.zlib.buffer + vs->tight.zlib.offset;
     zstream->avail_out = vs->tight.zlib.capacity - vs->tight.zlib.offset;
+    previous_out = zstream->avail_out;
     zstream->data_type = Z_BINARY;
-    previous_out = zstream->total_out;

     /* start encoding */
     if (deflate(zstream, Z_SYNC_FLUSH) != Z_OK) {
@@ -878,7 +878,8 @@ static int tight_compress_data(VncState *vs, int stream_id, 
size_t bytes,
     }

     vs->tight.zlib.offset = vs->tight.zlib.capacity - zstream->avail_out;
-    bytes = zstream->total_out - previous_out;
+    /* ...how much data has actually been produced by deflate() */
+    bytes = previous_out - zstream->avail_out;

     tight_send_compact_size(vs, bytes);
     vnc_write(vs, vs->tight.zlib.buffer, bytes);
diff --git a/ui/vnc-enc-zlib.c b/ui/vnc-enc-zlib.c
index 3c6e6ab..e32e4cd 100644
--- a/ui/vnc-enc-zlib.c
+++ b/ui/vnc-enc-zlib.c
@@ -103,8 +103,8 @@ static int vnc_zlib_stop(VncState *vs)
     zstream->avail_in = vs->zlib.zlib.offset;
     zstream->next_out = vs->output.buffer + vs->output.offset;
     zstream->avail_out = vs->output.capacity - vs->output.offset;
+    previous_out = zstream->avail_out;
     zstream->data_type = Z_BINARY;
-    previous_out = zstream->total_out;

     // start encoding
     if (deflate(zstream, Z_SYNC_FLUSH) != Z_OK) {
@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ static int vnc_zlib_stop(VncState *vs)
     }

     vs->output.offset = vs->output.capacity - zstream->avail_out;
-    return zstream->total_out - previous_out;
+    return previous_out - zstream->avail_out;
 }

 int vnc_zlib_send_framebuffer_update(VncState *vs, int x, int y, int w, int h)



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]