Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/4] Fix -icount with iothread

qemu-devel

From:	Paolo Bonzini
Subject:	Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/4] Fix -icount with iothread
Date:	Wed, 13 Apr 2011 07:03:55 +0200
User-agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101209 Fedora/3.1.7-0.35.b3pre.fc14 Lightning/1.0b3pre Mnenhy/0.8.3 Thunderbird/3.1.7

On 04/12/2011 11:50 PM, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote:

I also tested the code and it works beautifully for my testcases!
iothread & icount ran faster than icount without iothread.


That's very good news, thanks!

Paolo

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/4] Fix -icount with iothread, Paolo Bonzini, 2011/04/12
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/4] really fix -icount in the iothread case, Paolo Bonzini, 2011/04/12
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 2/4] enable vm_clock to "warp" in the iothread+icount case, Paolo Bonzini, 2011/04/12
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 4/4] qemu_next_deadline should not consider host-time timers, Paolo Bonzini, 2011/04/12
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 3/4] Revert wrong fixes for -icount in the iothread case, Paolo Bonzini, 2011/04/12
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/4] Fix -icount with iothread, Jan Kiszka, 2011/04/12
  - Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/4] Fix -icount with iothread, Paolo Bonzini, 2011/04/12
    - Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/4] Fix -icount with iothread, Edgar E. Iglesias, 2011/04/12
    - Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/4] Fix -icount with iothread, Paolo Bonzini <=