qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] tcg/tcg.c:1892: tcg fatal error


From: Blue Swirl
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] tcg/tcg.c:1892: tcg fatal error
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 20:40:35 +0300

On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 12:35 AM, Igor Kovalenko
<address@hidden> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 12:07 AM, Blue Swirl <address@hidden> wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 10:07 PM, Igor Kovalenko
>> <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 10:36 PM, Blue Swirl <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Artyom Tarasenko <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Aurelien Jarno <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 06:14:06PM +0400, Igor Kovalenko wrote:
>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 2:39 AM, Laurent Desnogues
>>>>>>> <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>>>>> > On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 9:45 PM, Igor Kovalenko
>>>>>>> > <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>>>>> >> On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 7:44 PM, Laurent Desnogues
>>>>>>> >> <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>>>>> >>> On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Artyom Tarasenko <address@hidden> 
>>>>>>> >>> wrote:
>>>>>>> >>>> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 4:14 AM, Igor Kovalenko
>>>>>>> >>>> <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Do you have public test case?
>>>>>>> >>>>>>> It is possible to code this delay slot write test but real 
>>>>>>> >>>>>>> issue may
>>>>>>> >>>>>>> be corruption elsewhere.
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>> The test case is trivial: it's just the two instructions, branch 
>>>>>>> >>>> and wrpr.
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>> In theory there could be multiple issues including compiler 
>>>>>>> >>>>> induced ones.
>>>>>>> >>>>> I'd prefer to see some kind of reproducible testcase.
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>> Ok, attached a 40 byte long test (the first 32 bytes are not used 
>>>>>>> >>>> and
>>>>>>> >>>> needed only because the bios entry point is 0x20).
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>> $ git pull && make && sparc64-softmmu/qemu-system-sparc64 -bios
>>>>>>> >>>> test-wrpr.bin -nographic
>>>>>>> >>>> Already up-to-date.
>>>>>>> >>>> make[1]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
>>>>>>> >>>> /mnt/terra/projects/vanilla/qemu/tcg/tcg.c:1892: tcg fatal error
>>>>>>> >>>> Aborted
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>> The problem seems to be that wrpr is using a non-local
>>>>>>> >>> TCG tmp (cpu_tmp0).
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> Just tried the test case with write to %pil - seems like write 
>>>>>>> >> itself is OK.
>>>>>>> >> The issue appears to be with save_state() call since adding 
>>>>>>> >> save_state
>>>>>>> >> to %pil case provokes the same tcg abort.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > The problem is that cpu_tmp0, not being a local tmp, doesn't
>>>>>>> > need to be saved across helper calls.  This results in the
>>>>>>> > TCG "optimizer" getting rid of it even though it's later used.
>>>>>>> > Look at the log and you'll see what I mean :-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm not very comfortable with tcg yet. Would it be possible to teach
>>>>>>> optimizer working with delay slots? Or do I look in the wrong place.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The problem is not on the TCG side, but on the target-sparc/translate.c
>>>>>> side:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> |                    case 0x32: /* wrwim, V9 wrpr */
>>>>>> |                         {
>>>>>> |                             if (!supervisor(dc))
>>>>>> |                                 goto priv_insn;
>>>>>> |                             tcg_gen_xor_tl(cpu_tmp0, cpu_src1, 
>>>>>> cpu_src2);
>>>>>> | #ifdef TARGET_SPARC64
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here cpu_tmp0 is loaded. cpu_tmp0 is a TCG temp, which means it is not
>>>>>> saved across TCG branches.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> |                             case 6: // pstate
>>>>>> |                                 save_state(dc, cpu_cond);
>>>>>> |                                 gen_helper_wrpstate(cpu_tmp0);
>>>>>> |                                 dc->npc = DYNAMIC_PC;
>>>>>> |                                 break;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> save_state() calls save_npc(), which in turns might call
>>>>>> gen_generic_branch():
>>>>>
>>>>> Hmm. This is not the only instruction using save_state() and cpu_tmp0.
>>>>> At least ldd is another example.
>>>>>
>>>>>> | static inline void gen_generic_branch(target_ulong npc1, target_ulong 
>>>>>> npc2,
>>>>>> |                                       TCGv r_cond)
>>>>>> | {
>>>>>> |     int l1, l2;
>>>>>> |
>>>>>> |     l1 = gen_new_label();
>>>>>> |     l2 = gen_new_label();
>>>>>> |
>>>>>> |     tcg_gen_brcondi_tl(TCG_COND_EQ, r_cond, 0, l1);
>>>>>> |
>>>>>> |     tcg_gen_movi_tl(cpu_npc, npc1);
>>>>>> |     tcg_gen_br(l2);
>>>>>> |
>>>>>> |     gen_set_label(l1);
>>>>>> |     tcg_gen_movi_tl(cpu_npc, npc2);
>>>>>> |     gen_set_label(l2);
>>>>>> | }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And here is the TCG branch, which drop the TCG temp cpu_temp0.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The solution is either to rewrite gen_generic_branch() without TCG
>>>>>> branches, or to use a TCG temp local instead of a TCG temp.
>>>>>
>>>>> You mean something like
>>>>>
>>>>>                            case 6: // pstate
>>>>>                                {
>>>>>                                    TCGv r_temp;
>>>>>
>>>>>                                    r_temp = tcg_temp_new();
>>>>>                                    tcg_gen_mov_tl(r_temp, cpu_tmp0);
>>>>>                                    save_state(dc, cpu_cond);
>>>>>                                    gen_helper_wrpstate(r_temp);
>>>>>                                    tcg_temp_free(r_temp);
>>>>>                                    dc->npc = DYNAMIC_PC;
>>>>>                                }
>>>>>                                break;
>>>>>
>>>>> ?
>>>>> This fails with the same error message.
>>>>
>>>> Close, but you need to use tcg_temp_local_new(). Does this work?
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/target-sparc/translate.c b/target-sparc/translate.c
>>>> index 3c958b2..52fa2f1 100644
>>>> --- a/target-sparc/translate.c
>>>> +++ b/target-sparc/translate.c
>>>> @@ -3505,9 +3505,15 @@ static void disas_sparc_insn(DisasContext * dc)
>>>>                                 tcg_gen_mov_tl(cpu_tbr, cpu_tmp0);
>>>>                                 break;
>>>>                             case 6: // pstate
>>>> -                                save_state(dc, cpu_cond);
>>>> -                                gen_helper_wrpstate(cpu_tmp0);
>>>> -                                dc->npc = DYNAMIC_PC;
>>>> +                                {
>>>> +                                    TCGv r_tmp = tcg_temp_local_new();
>>>> +
>>>> +                                    tcg_gen_mov_tl(r_tmp, cpu_tmp0);
>>>> +                                    save_state(dc, cpu_cond);
>>>> +                                    gen_helper_wrpstate(r_tmp);
>>>> +                                    tcg_temp_free_ptr(r_tmp);
>>>> +                                    dc->npc = DYNAMIC_PC;
>>>> +                                }
>>>>                                 break;
>>>>                             case 7: // tl
>>>>                                 save_state(dc, cpu_cond);
>>>>
>>>
>>> This one works (I have tested similar change but tcg_temp_free() would
>>> be OK as well)
>>
>> Thanks for spotting, that was not intentional.
>>
>>> Could anyone please explain why it still works without being in delay
>>> slot? Simply pointing at optimizer does not work :(
>>
>> save_npc() will call gen_generic_branch() only if dc->npc == JUMP_PC,
>> which is used for delay slot handling. Otherwise gen_generic_branch()
>> is not called and thus  brcond does not get used, so the temporary
>> will not be flushed for non-delay slot cases.
>
> Great that explains it all, thanks! I think audit over translate.c
> would be needed, alternatively all main switch temps for sparc64 could
> be made local as hinted by Laurent - provided there is no significant
> speed impact.

I think there may be a few other cases. Local temps are allocated from
stack instead of CPU registers, so there could be a speed impact.

It would be better if this case could be detected more reliably
instead, for example enhancing the debugging mode for TCG.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]