qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 000/111] QEMU m68k core additions


From: Laurent Vivier
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 000/111] QEMU m68k core additions
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 21:57:34 +0200

Le jeudi 18 août 2011 à 20:42 +0100, Natalia Portillo a écrit :
> Hi Laurent,

Hi Natalia,

> El 18/08/2011, a las 15:02, Laurent Vivier escribió:
> 
> >  
> > 
> > 
> > Le 18 août 2011 à 13:12, "François Revol" <address@hidden> a écrit : 
> > 
> > > Le -10/01/-28163 20:59, Laurent Vivier a écrit : 
> > > > Le mercredi 17 août 2011 à 17:35 -0500, Anthony Liguori a
> > écrit : 
> > > >> On 08/17/2011 03:46 PM, Bryce Lanham wrote: 
> > > >>> These patches greatly expand Motorola 68k emulation within
> > qemu, and are what I used as a basis for my 
> > > >>> Google Summer of Code project to add NeXT hardware support to
> > QEMU. 
> > > >> 
> > > >> Please don't crap flood the list with a series of 100 patches. 
> > > >> 
> > > >> Split things into logical chunks such that a series can be
> > reasonably 
> > > >> reviewed and applied. 
> > > > 
> > > > And I'm not sure this series of patches is ready for inclusion
> > in qemu 
> > > > mainline as it should break existing m68k emulation... 
> > > > 
> > > > Bryce, you should only post your patches, refering to the
> > repository on 
> > > > which they apply, i.e.
> > git://gitorious.org/qemu-m68k/qemu-m68k.git , 
> > > > master branch. 
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Btw, are you planning on merging it back someday? 
> > > 
> >  
> > 
> > Yes... when it will work correctly.
> >  
> > 
> > I have at least, to rework 680x0 FPU part (80bit fpu) to not break
> > the existing one (64bit fpu).
> > I have to check modified instructions don't break existing m68k
> > emulation.
> 
> 
> Maybe Bryce can help you

I don't know if he is courageous enough to review and push 111
patches ;-)

> > Currently, I'm trying to port some parts of BasiliskII into Qemu to
> > be able to boot MacOS 7.6.
> 
> 
> Why are you planning to port a hack instead of making a full machine
> emulation?

Because I'm lazy and dumb: the work is already done, I like cut'n'paste.

Regards,
Laurent





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]