qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] Introduce QemuRWLock


From: Jan Kiszka
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] Introduce QemuRWLock
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2011 14:16:09 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); de; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080226 SUSE/2.0.0.12-1.1 Thunderbird/2.0.0.12 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666

On 2011-10-03 13:23, Harsh Prateek Bora wrote:
> SynthFS uses rwlocks, which raise the need of a generic QemuRWLock APIs.
> This patchset introduces the same making necessary changes to relevant code.

Is the impact of using a plain mutex measurable with 9pfs? Usually it
takes very heavy write sections or highly concurrent read sections to
actually make a difference. Looking at the cited code, I would dare to
rule out the former (even more if the malloc was moved out of the
critical section). But I cannot assess the latter.

If it does matter, I would vote for introducing RCU directly.

Jan

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]