qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/6] block: do request processing in a coroutine


From: Zhi Yong Wu
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/6] block: do request processing in a coroutine
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 14:49:04 +0800

On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 12:17 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi
<address@hidden> wrote:
> Block layer features like dirty block tracing, I/O throttling, and live block
> copy are forced to duplicate code due to the three different interfaces:
> synchronous, asynchronous, and coroutines.
>
> Since there are bdrv_read(), bdrv_aio_readv(), and bdrv_co_readv() interfaces
> for read (and similar for write), per-request processing needs to be 
> duplicated
> for each of these execution contexts.  For example, dirty block tracking code
> is duplicated across these three interfaces.
>
> This patch series unifies request processing so that there is only one code
> path.  I see this as a prerequisite to the live block copy (image streaming)
> code I am working on, so I'm pushing it now.
>
> The short-term win from this series is that it becomes easy to add live block
> copy and other features.  We now have a single code path where the 
> perf-request
> processing is done.
>
> The longer-term win will be dropping the BlockDriver .bdrv_read(),
> .bdrv_write(), .bdrv_aio_readv(), and .bdrv_aio_writev() interfaces.  By doing
> that we can bring all BlockDrivers onto a common interface, namely
> .bdrv_co_readv() and .bdrv_co_writev().  It will also allow us to drop most of
> the sync and aio emulation code.
>
> A consequence of this patch series is that every I/O request goes through at
> least one coroutine.  There is no longer a direct .bdrv_read(), .bdrv_write(),
> .bdrv_aio_readv(), or .bdrv_aio_writev() call - we're trying to phase out 
> those
> interfaces.  I have not noticed performance degradation in correctness tests
> but we need to confirm that there has not been a performance regression.
>
> Stefan Hajnoczi (6):
>  block: directly invoke .bdrv_aio_*() in bdrv_co_io_em()
>  block: split out bdrv_co_do_readv() and bdrv_co_do_writev()
>  block: switch bdrv_read()/bdrv_write() to coroutines
>  block: switch bdrv_aio_readv() to coroutines
>  block: mark blocks dirty on coroutine write completion
>  block: switch bdrv_aio_writev() to coroutines
>
>  block.c |  273 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------------
>  1 files changed, 134 insertions(+), 139 deletions(-)
OK. When i am available, i will play with it.
>
> --
> 1.7.6.3
>
>
>



-- 
Regards,

Zhi Yong Wu



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]