Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/4] softfloat: Avoid uint16 type conflict on Darwin

[Andreas Färber]

Am 01.11.2011 20:25, schrieb Eric Sunshine:
> I forgot to mention that with your patch, only cocoa.m is seeing
> Darwin's definition of uint16. The rest of qemu is seeing the definition
> from softfloat.h. This inconsistency hopefully is not harmful in the
> short-term, which is why I asked about the goal. If the short-term idea
> is for cocoa.m to build cleanly but not to worry much that cocoa.m sees
> a different uint16 from the rest of qemu, then the less intrusive patch
> involving only cocoa.m may be preferable.

Ouch. Meaning both our softfloat patches are wrong, so I'll go with (2).
It's evening in Italy and the last day for submaintainer PULLs.

AF