qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/9] arm: add missing scu registers


From: Peter Maydell
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/9] arm: add missing scu registers
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 19:30:53 +0000

On 20 December 2011 19:10, Mark Langsdorf <address@hidden> wrote:
> From: Rob Herring <address@hidden>
>
> Add power control and non-secure access ctrl registers
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <address@hidden>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Langsdorf <address@hidden>
> ---
>  hw/a9mpcore.c |   26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/a9mpcore.c b/hw/a9mpcore.c
> index cd2985f..6e03fad 100644
> --- a/hw/a9mpcore.c
> +++ b/hw/a9mpcore.c
> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ gic_get_current_cpu(void)
>  typedef struct a9mp_priv_state {
>     gic_state gic;
>     uint32_t scu_control;
> +    uint32_t scu_status;
>     uint32_t old_timer_status[8];
>     uint32_t num_cpu;
>     qemu_irq *timer_irq;

New registers need to be added to the VMStateDescription too.

> @@ -48,7 +49,13 @@ static uint64_t a9_scu_read(void *opaque,
> target_phys_addr_t offset,
>     case 0x04: /* Configuration */
>         return (((1 << s->num_cpu) - 1) << 4) | (s->num_cpu - 1);
>     case 0x08: /* CPU Power Status */
> -        return 0;
> +        return s->scu_status;
> +    case 0x09: /* CPU status.  */
> +        return s->scu_status >> 8;
> +    case 0x0a: /* CPU status.  */
> +        return s->scu_status >> 16;
> +    case 0x0b: /* CPU status.  */
> +        return s->scu_status >> 24;
>     case 0x0c: /* Invalidate All Registers In Secure State */
>         return 0;
>     case 0x40: /* Filtering Start Address Register */
> @@ -73,6 +80,22 @@ static void a9_scu_write(void *opaque, target_phys_addr_t
> offset,
>         break;
>     case 0x4: /* Configuration: RO */
>         break;
> +    case 0x08: /* Power Control  */
> +        s->scu_status &= ~0xff;
> +        s->scu_status |= value & 0xff;
> +        break;
> +    case 0x09: /* Power Control  */
> +        s->scu_status &= ~(0xff << 8);
> +        s->scu_status |= (value & 0xff) << 8;
> +        break;
> +    case 0x0A: /* Power Control  */
> +        s->scu_status &= ~(0xff << 16);
> +        s->scu_status |= (value & 0xff) << 16;
> +        break;
> +    case 0x0B: /* Power Control  */
> +        s->scu_status &= ~(0xff << 24);
> +        s->scu_status |= (value & 0xff) << 24;
> +        break;

This works for byte writes but will do the wrong thing for
halfword and word writes to the register.

>     case 0x0c: /* Invalidate All Registers In Secure State */
>         /* no-op as we do not implement caches */
>         break;
> @@ -80,7 +103,6 @@ static void a9_scu_write(void *opaque, target_phys_addr_t
> offset,
>     case 0x44: /* Filtering End Address Register */
>         /* RAZ/WI, like an implementation with only one AXI master */
>         break;
> -    case 0x8: /* CPU Power Status */
>     case 0x50: /* SCU Access Control Register */
>     case 0x54: /* SCU Non-secure Access Control Register */
>         /* unimplemented, fall through */
> --
> 1.7.5.4

-- PMM



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]