[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2][RFC] postcopy migration: Linux char device
From: |
Isaku Yamahata |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2][RFC] postcopy migration: Linux char device for postcopy |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Jan 2012 11:15:40 +0900 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) |
One more question.
Does your architecture/implementation (in theory) allow KVM memory
features like swap, KSM, THP?
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 11:03:23AM +0900, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> Very interesting. We can cooperate for better (postcopy) live migration.
> The code doesn't seem available yet, I'm eager for it.
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 01:09:30AM +0000, Benoit Hudzia wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Sorry to jump to hijack the thread like that , however i would like
> > to just to inform you that we recently achieve a milestone out of the
> > research project I'm leading. We enhanced KVM in order to deliver
> > post copy live migration using RDMA at kernel level.
> >
> > Few point on the architecture of the system :
> >
> > * RDMA communication engine in kernel ( you can use soft iwarp or soft
> > ROCE if you don't have hardware acceleration, however we also support
> > standard RDMA enabled NIC) .
>
> Do you mean infiniband subsystem?
>
>
> > * Naturally Page are transferred with Zerop copy protocol
> > * Leverage the async page fault system.
> > * Pre paging / faulting
> > * No context switch as everything is handled within kernel and using
> > the page fault system.
> > * Hybrid migration ( pre + post copy) available
>
> Ah, I've been also planing this.
> After pre-copy phase, is the dirty bitmap sent?
>
> So far I've thought naively that pre-copy phase would be finished by the
> number of iterations. On the other hand your choice is timeout of
> pre-copy phase. Do you have rationale? or it was just natural for you?
>
>
> > * Rely on an independent Kernel Module
> > * No modification to the KVM kernel Module
> > * Minimal Modification to the Qemu-Kvm code
> > * We plan to add the page prioritization algo in order to optimise the
> > pre paging algo and background transfer
>
> Where do you plan to implement? in qemu or in your kernel module?
> This algo could be shared.
>
> thanks in advance.
>
> > You can learn a little bit more and see a demo here:
> > http://tinyurl.com/8xa2bgl
> > I hope to be able to provide more detail on the design soon. As well
> > as more concrete demo of the system ( live migration of VM running
> > large enterprise apps such as ERP or In memory DB)
> >
> > Note: this is just a step stone as the post copy live migration mainly
> > enable us to validate the architecture design and code.
> >
> > Regards
> > Benoit
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Regards
> > Benoit
> >
> >
> > On 12 January 2012 13:59, Avi Kivity <address@hidden> wrote:
> > > On 01/04/2012 05:03 AM, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> > >> Yes, it's quite doable in user space(qemu) with a kernel-enhancement.
> > >> And it would be easy to convert a separated daemon process into a thread
> > >> in qemu.
> > >>
> > >> I think it should be done out side of qemu process for some reasons.
> > >> (I just repeat same discussion at the KVM-forum because no one remembers
> > >> it)
> > >>
> > >> - ptrace (and its variant)
> > >> ?? Some people want to investigate guest ram on host (qemu stopped or
> > >> lively).
> > >> ?? For example, enhance crash utility and it will attach qemu process and
> > >> ?? debug guest kernel.
> > >
> > > To debug the guest kernel you don't need to stop qemu itself. ?? I agree
> > > it's a problem for qemu debugging though.
> > >
> > >>
> > >> - core dump
> > >> ?? qemu process may core-dump.
> > >> ?? As postmortem analysis, people want to investigate guest RAM.
> > >> ?? Again enhance crash utility and it will read the core file and analyze
> > >> ?? guest kernel.
> > >> ?? When creating core, the qemu process is already dead.
> > >
> > > Yes, strong point.
> > >
> > >> It precludes the above possibilities to handle fault in qemu process.
> > >
> > > I agree.
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
> > > the body of a message to address@hidden
> > > More majordomo info at ??http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > " The production of too many useful things results in too many useless
> > people"
> >
>
> --
> yamahata
>
--
yamahata
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2][RFC] postcopy migration: Linux char device for postcopy, (continued)
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2][RFC] postcopy migration: Linux char device for postcopy, Isaku Yamahata, 2012/01/03
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2][RFC] postcopy migration: Linux char device for postcopy, Benoit Hudzia, 2012/01/13