qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] use different fd variables for device and socke


From: Michael Tokarev
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] use different fd variables for device and socket, unbreak qemu-nbd -c
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2012 17:01:01 +0400
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110805 Icedove/5.0

On 15.01.2012 14:45, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 01/14/2012 12:41 PM, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> commit a61c67828dea7c64edaf226cadb45b4ffcc1d411
>> Author: Paolo Bonzini<address@hidden>
>> Date:   Mon Sep 12 17:28:11 2011 +0200
>>
>>      qemu-nbd: use common main loop
>>
>>      Using a single main loop for sockets will help yielding from the socket
>>      coroutine back to the main loop, and later reentering it.
>>
>> changed code to use local variable "fd" in qemu-nbd.c:main()
>> in two places: for /dev/nbd device and for control socket.
>> The result is that qemu-nbd -c $device does not work anymore.
>>
>> Use two variables - devfs and sockfd - for the two purposes,
>> instead of one fd.
>>
>> Signed-Off-By: Michael Tokarev<address@hidden>
>> ---
>>   qemu-nbd.c |   26 +++++++++++++-------------
>>   1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/qemu-nbd.c b/qemu-nbd.c
>> index eb61c33..e76c782 100644
>> --- a/qemu-nbd.c
>> +++ b/qemu-nbd.c
>> @@ -301,7 +301,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>>       int flags = BDRV_O_RDWR;
>>       int partition = -1;
>>       int ret;
>> -    int fd;
>> +    int sockfd, devfd;
>>       int persistent = 0;
>>       pthread_t client_thread;
>>
>> @@ -401,13 +401,13 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>>       }
>>
>>       if (disconnect) {
>> -        fd = open(argv[optind], O_RDWR);
>> -        if (fd == -1)
>> +        sockfd = open(argv[optind], O_RDWR);
>> +        if (sockfd == -1)
>>               err(EXIT_FAILURE, "Cannot open %s", argv[optind]);
>>
>> -        nbd_disconnect(fd);
>> +        nbd_disconnect(sockfd);
>>
>> -        close(fd);
>> +        close(sockfd);
>>
>>           printf("%s disconnected\n", argv[optind]);
> 
> This should be devfd.

Yes indeed.  In that case make it nbdfd not devfd - there are other
variables prefixed "nbd" already.

[]
> Otherwise looks good, I'll fix up and send for inclusion.

Thanks!

FWIW, it is not -stable material, since 1.0 isn't broken yet ;)

/mjt



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]