Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu-kvm upstreaming: Do we want -kvm-shadow-memory semantics?

[Marcelo Tosatti]

On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 01:46:39PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Hi again,
> 
> do we need some KVM knob comparable to qemu-kvm's -kvm-shadow-memory in
> upstream?
> 
> If yes: The underlying IOCTL is x86-only. Are other archs interested in
> this long-term as well, ie. should the control become arch-independent?
> 
> Jan

Last time i asked about removal, Avi wished for it to remain.