[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Qemu-devel] [Bug 524447] Re: virsh save is very slow
From: |
BenLake |
Subject: |
[Qemu-devel] [Bug 524447] Re: virsh save is very slow |
Date: |
Sat, 28 Jan 2012 19:10:51 -0000 |
@Serge @Chris - So it sounds like this _could_ make it into Lucid?
Anyone I can bribe to make that happen?
As an aside, I have been running LTS versions for 8 years and I must say
it seems we need a different priority scale for LTS. This bug renders
the use of kvm in 10.04 very painful and the plan would be to let that
exist for 5 years? Feels like a lot of key improvements are overlooked
because they don't make your machine explode, but from a sys admins
perspective, it feels like the risks of running the latest versions so
bug fixes trickle in outweighs the missing bits in an unmaintained LTS
:/
This issue + this one
(https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/555981) makes
for a sad day.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of qemu-
devel-ml, which is subscribed to QEMU.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524447
Title:
virsh save is very slow
Status in libvirt virtualization API:
Unknown
Status in QEMU:
Fix Released
Status in “libvirt” package in Ubuntu:
Invalid
Status in “qemu-kvm” package in Ubuntu:
Fix Released
Status in “libvirt” source package in Lucid:
Won't Fix
Status in “qemu-kvm” source package in Lucid:
Won't Fix
Status in “libvirt” source package in Maverick:
Won't Fix
Status in “qemu-kvm” source package in Maverick:
Won't Fix
Status in “qemu-kvm” package in Debian:
Fix Released
Bug description:
==================================
SRU Justification:
1. impact: 'qemu save' is slow
2. how addressed: a patch upstream fixes the case when a file does not
announce when it is ready.
3. patch: see the patch in linked bzr trees
4. TEST CASE: see comment #4 for a specific recipe
5. regression potential: this patch only touches the vm save path.
==================================
As reported here: http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-
list/2009-December/msg00203.html
"virsh save" is very slow - it writes the image at around 1MB/sec on
my test system.
(I think I saw a bug report for this issue on Fedora's bugzilla, but I
can't find it now...)
Confirmed under Karmic.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/libvirt/+bug/524447/+subscriptions
- [Qemu-devel] [Bug 524447] Re: virsh save is very slow,
BenLake <=