[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] virtio-blk performance regression and qemu-kvm
From: |
Rusty Russell |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] virtio-blk performance regression and qemu-kvm |
Date: |
Mon, 13 Feb 2012 10:25:59 +1030 |
User-agent: |
Notmuch/0.6.1-1 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) |
On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:36:39 +0100, Dongsu Park <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Recently I observed performance regression regarding virtio-blk,
> especially different IO bandwidths between qemu-kvm 0.14.1 and 1.0.
> So I want to share the benchmark results, and ask you what the reason
> would be.
Interesting. There are two obvious possibilities here. One is that
qemu has regressed, the other is that virtio_blk has regressed; the new
qemu may negotiate new features. Please do the following in the guest
with old and new qemus:
cat /sys/class/block/vdb/device/features
(eg, here that gives: 0010101101100000000000000000100e0).
Thanks,
Rusty.
- [Qemu-devel] virtio-blk performance regression and qemu-kvm, Dongsu Park, 2012/02/10
- Re: [Qemu-devel] virtio-blk performance regression and qemu-kvm,
Rusty Russell <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] virtio-blk performance regression and qemu-kvm, Stefan Hajnoczi, 2012/02/13
- Re: [Qemu-devel] virtio-blk performance regression and qemu-kvm, Dongsu Park, 2012/02/21
- Re: [Qemu-devel] virtio-blk performance regression and qemu-kvm, Stefan Hajnoczi, 2012/02/21
- Re: [Qemu-devel] virtio-blk performance regression and qemu-kvm, Dongsu Park, 2012/02/22
- Re: [Qemu-devel] virtio-blk performance regression and qemu-kvm, Stefan Hajnoczi, 2012/02/22
- Re: [Qemu-devel] virtio-blk performance regression and qemu-kvm, Martin Mailand, 2012/02/28
- Re: [Qemu-devel] virtio-blk performance regression and qemu-kvm, Stefan Hajnoczi, 2012/02/28
- Re: [Qemu-devel] virtio-blk performance regression and qemu-kvm, Martin Mailand, 2012/02/28