[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] linux guests and ksm performance
From: |
Stefan Hajnoczi |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] linux guests and ksm performance |
Date: |
Thu, 23 Feb 2012 16:42:54 +0000 |
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Peter Lieven <address@hidden> wrote:
> However, in a virtual machine I have not observed the above slow down to
> that extend
> while the benefit of zero after free in a virtualisation environment is
> obvious:
>
> 1) zero pages can easily be merged by ksm or other technique.
> 2) zero (dup) pages are a lot faster to transfer in case of migration.
The other approach is a memory page "discard" mechanism - which
obviously requires more code changes than zeroing freed pages.
The advantage is that we don't take the brute-force and CPU intensive
approach of zeroing pages. It would be like a fine-grained ballooning
feature.
I hope someone will follow up saying this has already been done or
prototyped :).
Stefan
- [Qemu-devel] linux guests and ksm performance, Peter Lieven, 2012/02/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] linux guests and ksm performance,
Stefan Hajnoczi <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] linux guests and ksm performance, Javier Guerra Giraldez, 2012/02/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] linux guests and ksm performance, address@hidden, 2012/02/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] linux guests and ksm performance, Stefan Hajnoczi, 2012/02/24
- Re: [Qemu-devel] linux guests and ksm performance, Stefan Hajnoczi, 2012/02/24
- Re: [Qemu-devel] linux guests and ksm performance, Stefan Hajnoczi, 2012/02/24
- Re: [Qemu-devel] linux guests and ksm performance, Peter Lieven, 2012/02/24
- Re: [Qemu-devel] linux guests and ksm performance, Peter Lieven, 2012/02/28
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: [Qemu-devel] linux guests and ksm performance, Peter Lieven, 2012/02/28
- Re: [Qemu-devel] linux guests and ksm performance, Avi Kivity, 2012/02/28
- Re: [Qemu-devel] linux guests and ksm performance, Peter Lieven, 2012/02/28