qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 07/13] iommu: Make sglists and dma_bdrv helpers


From: Paolo Bonzini
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 07/13] iommu: Make sglists and dma_bdrv helpers use new universal DMA helpers
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2012 11:11:41 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.1

Il 09/03/2012 06:01, David Gibson ha scritto:
> dma-helpers.c contains a number of helper functions for doing
> scatter/gather DMA, and various block device related DMA.  Currently,
> these directly access guest memory using cpu_physical_memory_*(),
> assuming no IOMMU translation.
> 
> This patch updates this code to use the new universal DMA helper
> functions.  qemu_sglist_init() now takes a DMAContext * to describe
> the DMA address space in which the scatter/gather will take place.
> 
> We minimally update the callers qemu_sglist_init() to pass NULL
> (i.e. no translation, same as current behaviour).  Some of those
> callers should pass something else in some cases to allow proper IOMMU
> translation in future, but that will be fixed in later patches.
> 
> Cc: Kevin Wolf <address@hidden>
> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <address@hidden>
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Gibson <address@hidden>
> ---
>  dma-helpers.c  |   26 ++++++++++++++++++--------
>  dma.h          |    3 ++-
>  hw/ide/ahci.c  |    3 ++-
>  hw/ide/macio.c |    4 ++--
>  hw/pci.h       |    2 +-
>  5 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/dma-helpers.c b/dma-helpers.c
> index 5f19a85..9dcfb2c 100644
> --- a/dma-helpers.c
> +++ b/dma-helpers.c
> @@ -11,12 +11,13 @@
>  #include "block_int.h"
>  #include "trace.h"
>  
> -void qemu_sglist_init(QEMUSGList *qsg, int alloc_hint)
> +void qemu_sglist_init(QEMUSGList *qsg, int alloc_hint, DMAContext *dma)
>  {
>      qsg->sg = g_malloc(alloc_hint * sizeof(ScatterGatherEntry));
>      qsg->nsg = 0;
>      qsg->nalloc = alloc_hint;
>      qsg->size = 0;
> +    qsg->dma = dma;
>  }
>  
>  void qemu_sglist_add(QEMUSGList *qsg, dma_addr_t base, dma_addr_t len)
> @@ -75,10 +76,9 @@ static void dma_bdrv_unmap(DMAAIOCB *dbs)
>      int i;
>  
>      for (i = 0; i < dbs->iov.niov; ++i) {
> -        cpu_physical_memory_unmap(dbs->iov.iov[i].iov_base,
> -                                  dbs->iov.iov[i].iov_len,
> -                                  dbs->dir != DMA_DIRECTION_TO_DEVICE,
> -                                  dbs->iov.iov[i].iov_len);
> +        dma_memory_unmap(dbs->sg->dma, dbs->iov.iov[i].iov_base,
> +                         dbs->iov.iov[i].iov_len, dbs->dir,
> +                         dbs->iov.iov[i].iov_len);
>      }
>      qemu_iovec_reset(&dbs->iov);
>  }
> @@ -104,10 +104,20 @@ static void dma_complete(DMAAIOCB *dbs, int ret)
>      }
>  }
>  
> +static void dma_bdrv_cancel(void *opaque)
> +{
> +    DMAAIOCB *dbs = opaque;
> +
> +    bdrv_aio_cancel(dbs->acb);
> +    dma_bdrv_unmap(dbs);
> +    qemu_iovec_destroy(&dbs->iov);
> +    qemu_aio_release(dbs);
> +}

What Kevin said.  Instead of a generic callback, dma_memory_map should
probably just receive the AIOCB (in this case &dbs->common) and call
bdrv_aio_cancel on it.

>  static void dma_bdrv_cb(void *opaque, int ret)
>  {
>      DMAAIOCB *dbs = (DMAAIOCB *)opaque;
> -    target_phys_addr_t cur_addr, cur_len;
> +    dma_addr_t cur_addr, cur_len;
>      void *mem;
>  
>      trace_dma_bdrv_cb(dbs, ret);
> @@ -124,8 +134,8 @@ static void dma_bdrv_cb(void *opaque, int ret)
>      while (dbs->sg_cur_index < dbs->sg->nsg) {
>          cur_addr = dbs->sg->sg[dbs->sg_cur_index].base + dbs->sg_cur_byte;
>          cur_len = dbs->sg->sg[dbs->sg_cur_index].len - dbs->sg_cur_byte;
> -        mem = cpu_physical_memory_map(cur_addr, &cur_len,
> -                                      dbs->dir != DMA_DIRECTION_TO_DEVICE);
> +        mem = dma_memory_map(dbs->sg->dma, dma_bdrv_cancel, dbs,
> +                             cur_addr, &cur_len, dbs->dir);
>          if (!mem)
>              break;
>          qemu_iovec_add(&dbs->iov, mem, cur_len);

dma_buf_rw should also use the DMAContext here (passing a NULL
invalidate function).

Paolo



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]