Re: [Qemu-devel] We need more reviewers/maintainers!!

[Peter Maydell]

On 12 March 2012 20:29, Anthony Liguori <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 03/12/2012 03:24 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> I agree that that's a specific area it would be nice to do
>> better in. It seems to me that the qemu-trivial process for
>> sweeping up trivial patches has been working well; maybe we
>> could use a slightly more formal qemu-urgent process for
>> flagging up build breakage etc?
>>
>> (Personally I'd support a rule that any outstanding
>> build-breakage fixes must always go in before anything else.)
>
>
> When are build-breakage fixes not trivial?

'trivial' implies "it's OK if this patch doesn't go in for a
week or two until the trivial patch queue has built up to
a reasonable size". Also sending them via trivial means
there's no mechanism for causing them to be applied before
other commits/pullreqs. So generally I don't cc build-fixes to
trivial.

-- PMM