|
From: | Anthony Liguori |
Subject: | Re: [Qemu-devel] We need more reviewers/maintainers!! |
Date: | Tue, 13 Mar 2012 09:43:38 -0500 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 |
On 03/13/2012 09:39 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 03/13/2012 04:12 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:(plus it puts an extra person in the loop which is pretty much guaranteed to slow things down).Having the committers process all these patches (and monitor all patches) is guaranteed to slow things down too.They're in the loop anyway, because they have to process the pull request just as they would a single patch.Anthony's shunting emails with [PULL] into a special queue, so yes they're in the loop, but it's a smaller one.
Right, if we want urgency on something, there has to be a filterable keyword. I don't read every single message on qemu-devel every hour of the day.
The advantage of [PULL] over [urgent] is that it fits the existing workflows. It's clear who should be doing [PULL] requests.
Regards, Anthony Liguori
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |