[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Qemu-devel] unreviewed commits (was: Re: Restore consistent formatting)
From: |
Peter Maydell |
Subject: |
[Qemu-devel] unreviewed commits (was: Re: Restore consistent formatting) |
Date: |
Thu, 3 May 2012 20:58:35 +0100 |
On 9 February 2012 13:46, Anthony Liguori <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 02/09/2012 03:48 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> You buried the one truly important sentence, let me dig it out for you:
>>
>> *** Patches should always go to the mailing list ***
>>
>> Exceptions need justification. Responsible handling embargoed security
>> issues may qualify. Style fixes certainly not.
>
> 100% agreed.
I don't see anything in the mailing list archives corresponding
to commits f05ae537, f6af014e.
No unreviewed patches should go double when we're in hardfreeze!
-- PMM
- [Qemu-devel] unreviewed commits (was: Re: Restore consistent formatting),
Peter Maydell <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] unreviewed commits (was: Re: Restore consistent formatting), Anthony Liguori, 2012/05/03
- Re: [Qemu-devel] unreviewed commits (was: Re: Restore consistent formatting), Andreas Färber, 2012/05/03
- Re: [Qemu-devel] unreviewed commits (was: Re: Restore consistent formatting), malc, 2012/05/03
- Re: [Qemu-devel] unreviewed commits (was: Re: Restore consistent formatting), Alexander Graf, 2012/05/04
- Re: [Qemu-devel] unreviewed commits (was: Re: Restore consistent formatting), Blue Swirl, 2012/05/06
- Re: [Qemu-devel] unreviewed commits (was: Re: Restore consistent formatting), malc, 2012/05/06
- Re: [Qemu-devel] unreviewed commits (was: Re: Restore consistent formatting), Blue Swirl, 2012/05/06
- Re: [Qemu-devel] unreviewed commits (was: Re: Restore consistent formatting), malc, 2012/05/06
- Re: [Qemu-devel] unreviewed commits (was: Re: Restore consistent formatting), Blue Swirl, 2012/05/06
- Re: [Qemu-devel] unreviewed commits (was: Re: Restore consistent formatting), malc, 2012/05/06