qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] frame reordering in qemu_net_queue_send() ?


From: Jan Kiszka
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] frame reordering in qemu_net_queue_send() ?
Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 15:48:46 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); de; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080226 SUSE/2.0.0.12-1.1 Thunderbird/2.0.0.12 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666

On 2012-05-31 15:45, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi <address@hidden> wrote:
>> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Luigi Rizzo <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> while investigating rx performance for emulated network devices
>>> (i am looking at the userspace version, relying on net=tap
>>> or similar approaches) i noticed the code
>>> in net/queue.c :: qemu_net_queue_send()
>>> which look strange to me (same goes for the iov version).
>>>
>>> The whole function is below, just for reference.
>>> My impression is that the call to qemu_net_queue_flush()
>>> is misplaced, and it should be before qemu_net_queue_deliver()
>>> otherwise the current packet is pushed out before anything
>>> was already in the queue.
>>>
>>> Does it make sense ?
>>>
>>> cheers
>>> luigi
>>>
>>>    ssize_t qemu_net_queue_send(NetQueue *queue,
>>>                                VLANClientState *sender,
>>>                                unsigned flags,
>>>                                const uint8_t *data,
>>>                                size_t size,
>>>                                NetPacketSent *sent_cb)
>>>    {
>>>        ssize_t ret;
>>>
>>>        if (queue->delivering) {
>>>            return qemu_net_queue_append(queue, sender, flags, data, size, 
>>> NULL);
>>>        }
>>>
>>>        ret = qemu_net_queue_deliver(queue, sender, flags, data, size);
>>>        if (ret == 0) {
>>>            qemu_net_queue_append(queue, sender, flags, data, size, sent_cb);
>>>            return 0;
>>>        }
>>>
>>>        qemu_net_queue_flush(queue);
>>
>> This of the case where delivering a packet causes additional
>> (re-entrant) qemu_net_queue_send() calls to this queue.  We'll be in
> If qemu_net_queue_send() are re-entranced, what issue or badness will
> it introduce?
> I haven't found what issue will take place when queue_flush() is moved
> before queue_deliver().
> 

Delayed packets that are hold back during delivering==1. Having a flush
before and after may be fine - if we really need it before.

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]