Re: [Qemu-devel] buildbot failure in qemu on default_ppc

[Alexander Graf]

On 05.06.2012, at 03:04, Anthony Liguori wrote:

> On 06/05/2012 09:00 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> 
>> On 05.06.2012, at 02:58, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> 
>>> On 06/05/2012 08:54 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
>>>> Am 05.06.2012 01:33, schrieb address@hidden:
>>>>> The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder default_ppc while 
>>>>> building qemu.
>>>>> Full details are available at:
>>>>>  http://buildbot.b1-systems.de/qemu/builders/default_ppc/builds/417
>>>>> 
>>>>> Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.b1-systems.de/qemu/
>>>>> 
>>>>> Buildslave for this Build: qemu-ppc.opensuse.org
>>>>> 
>>>>> Build Reason: The Nightly scheduler named 'nightly_default' triggered 
>>>>> this build
>>>>> Build Source Stamp: [branch master] HEAD
>>>>> Blamelist:
>>>>> 
>>>>> BUILD FAILED: failed compile
>>>> 
>>>>   CC    ppc-softmmu/kvm-all.o
>>>> /home/build/qemu/default_ppc/build/kvm-all.c:66: error: field 'kroute'
>>>> has incomplete type
>>>> /home/build/qemu/default_ppc/build/kvm-all.c: In function 'kvm_init':
>>>> /home/build/qemu/default_ppc/build/kvm-all.c:1289: error: 'KVMState' has
>>>> no member named 'direct_msi'
>>>> make[1]: *** [kvm-all.o] Error 1
>>>> make: *** [subdir-ppc-softmmu] Error 2
>>> 
>>> Aren't GSI and even MSI very x86-centric concepts?   Why is this code in 
>>> kvm-all.c to begin with?
>> 
>> Weren't GSIs a logical APIC map thing?
> 
> I think GSI is an ACPI concept actually.

Sorry, too many acronyms. Yeah, I meant ACPI. Though some map was ACPI and 
another map was Linux specific. I tend to forget which of the 50 layers between 
hardware and what you see are actually dictated by whom :).


Alex