[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/3] bitops: fix types
From: |
Blue Swirl |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/3] bitops: fix types |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Jul 2012 20:21:28 +0000 |
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Kevin Wolf <address@hidden> wrote:
> Am 08.07.2012 21:22, schrieb address@hidden:
>> From: Blue Swirl <address@hidden>
>>
>> Use 'unsigned int' for bit numbers instead of 'unsigned long' or
>> 'int'. Adjust asserts.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Blue Swirl <address@hidden>
>
> I haven't followed the original discussion and therefore don't know what
> the controversy is about (nor do I feel like reading it up), but if
> there is no consensus, I would expect even more than already for normal
> patches that the commit message doesn't only state the obvious change,
> but also the reasons for the change.
>
> This message isn't much different from the famous "i++; /* increase i by
> one */" code comment.
The message could be improved by vast amounts, but in my view it is
sufficient for such a simple change.
>
> Kevin
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/3] bitops: drop volatile qualifier, (continued)
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/3] bitops: fix types, blauwirbel, 2012/07/08
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/3] bitops: fix types, Markus Armbruster, 2012/07/09
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/3] bitops: fix types, Blue Swirl, 2012/07/10
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/3] bitops: fix types, Peter Maydell, 2012/07/10
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/3] bitops: fix types, Blue Swirl, 2012/07/10
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/3] bitops: fix types, Peter Maydell, 2012/07/10
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/3] bitops: fix types, Blue Swirl, 2012/07/12
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/3] bitops: fix types, Peter Maydell, 2012/07/12
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/3] bitops: fix types, Kevin Wolf, 2012/07/11
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/3] bitops: use bool, blauwirbel, 2012/07/08