qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 1/4] qemu-char: Convert MemCharDriver to cir


From: Lei Li
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 1/4] qemu-char: Convert MemCharDriver to circular buffer
Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 18:57:37 +0800
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120717 Thunderbird/14.0

On 08/02/2012 05:30 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Lei Li <address@hidden> writes:

Signed-off-by: Lei Li <address@hidden>
---
  qemu-char.c |   96 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
  qemu-char.h |    2 +-
  2 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/qemu-char.c b/qemu-char.c
index c2aaaee..087c92d 100644
--- a/qemu-char.c
+++ b/qemu-char.c
@@ -2517,38 +2517,96 @@ static CharDriverState *qemu_chr_open_socket(QemuOpts 
*opts)
  /***********************************************************/
  /* Memory chardev */
  typedef struct {
-    size_t outbuf_size;
-    size_t outbuf_capacity;
-    uint8_t *outbuf;
+    size_t cbuf_capacity;
+    size_t cbuf_in;
+    size_t cbuf_out;
+    size_t cbuf_count;
+    uint8_t *cbuf;
  } MemoryDriver;
Probably should move the buffer into a separate structure and then you
can drop the cbuf_ prefixes.

+static int mem_chr_is_empty(CharDriverState *chr)
+{
+    MemoryDriver *d = chr->opaque;
+
+    return d->cbuf_count == 0;
+}
+
+static int mem_chr_is_full(CharDriverState *chr)
+{
+    MemoryDriver *d = chr->opaque;
+
+    return d->cbuf_count == d->cbuf_capacity;
+}
+
Typically, you would use a producer and a consumer index.  To test for
empty, you would check if (consumer == producer).

To check for full, you would check if ((producer - consumer) == size).

To get the actual index, you always modulus the indexes with size.  This
only works if size is a power of 2 but that's a reasonable restriction.

  static int mem_chr_write(CharDriverState *chr, const uint8_t *buf, int len)
  {
      MemoryDriver *d = chr->opaque;
+    int left;
- /* TODO: the QString implementation has the same code, we should
-     * introduce a generic way to do this in cutils.c */
-    if (d->outbuf_capacity < d->outbuf_size + len) {
-        /* grow outbuf */
-        d->outbuf_capacity += len;
-        d->outbuf_capacity *= 2;
-        d->outbuf = g_realloc(d->outbuf, d->outbuf_capacity);
+    if (d->cbuf_capacity < len) {
+        return -1;
      }
- memcpy(d->outbuf + d->outbuf_size, buf, len);
-    d->outbuf_size += len;
+    left = d->cbuf_capacity - d->cbuf_count % d->cbuf_capacity;
+
+    /* Some of cbuf need to be overwrited */
+    if (left < len) {
+        memcpy(d->cbuf + d->cbuf_in, buf, left);
+        memcpy(d->cbuf + d->cbuf_out, buf + left, len - left);
+        d->cbuf_out = (d->cbuf_out + len - left) % d->cbuf_capacity;
+        d->cbuf_count = d->cbuf_count + left;
Doing a mempcy() like this may work, but seems inefficient to me.  I
think reading like a ring queue works a bit nicer.

Hi Anthony,

What do you mean "reading like a ring queue"?  I am a little confused
here. Could you please give more details?

And thanks for your suggestions. :)

+    } else {
+        /* Completely overwrite */
+        if (mem_chr_is_full(chr)) {
+            d->cbuf_out = (d->cbuf_out + len) % d->cbuf_capacity;
+        } else {
+        /* Enough cbuf to write */
+        memcpy(d->cbuf + d->cbuf_in, buf, len);
+        d->cbuf_count += len;
+        }
Looks like indenting is off here.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

+    }
+
+    d->cbuf_in = (d->cbuf_in + len) % d->cbuf_capacity;
return len;
  }
-void qemu_chr_init_mem(CharDriverState *chr)
+static void mem_chr_read(CharDriverState *chr, uint8_t *buf, int len)
+{
+    MemoryDriver *d = chr->opaque;
+    int left;
+
+    if (mem_chr_is_empty(chr)) {
+        return;
+    }
+
+    left = d->cbuf_capacity - d->cbuf_count % d->cbuf_capacity;
+
+    if (d->cbuf_capacity < len) {
+        len = d->cbuf_capacity;
+    }
+
+    if (left < len) {
+        memcpy(buf, d->cbuf + d->cbuf_out, left);
+        memcpy(buf + left, d->cbuf + d->cbuf_out + left, len - left);
+    } else {
+        memcpy(buf, d->cbuf + d->cbuf_out, len);
+    }
+
+    d->cbuf_out = (d->cbuf_out + len) % d->cbuf_capacity;
+    d->cbuf_count -= len;
+}
+
+void qemu_chr_init_mem(CharDriverState *chr, size_t size)
  {
      MemoryDriver *d;
d = g_malloc(sizeof(*d));
-    d->outbuf_size = 0;
-    d->outbuf_capacity = 4096;
-    d->outbuf = g_malloc0(d->outbuf_capacity);
+    d->cbuf_capacity = size;
+    d->cbuf_in = 0;
+    d->cbuf_out = 0;
+    d->cbuf_count = 0;
+    d->cbuf = g_malloc0(d->cbuf_capacity);
memset(chr, 0, sizeof(*chr));
      chr->opaque = d;
@@ -2558,7 +2616,7 @@ void qemu_chr_init_mem(CharDriverState *chr)
  QString *qemu_chr_mem_to_qs(CharDriverState *chr)
  {
      MemoryDriver *d = chr->opaque;
-    return qstring_from_substr((char *) d->outbuf, 0, d->outbuf_size - 1);
+    return qstring_from_substr((char *) d->cbuf, 0, d->cbuf_count - 1);
  }
/* NOTE: this driver can not be closed with qemu_chr_delete()! */
@@ -2566,7 +2624,7 @@ void qemu_chr_close_mem(CharDriverState *chr)
  {
      MemoryDriver *d = chr->opaque;
- g_free(d->outbuf);
+    g_free(d->cbuf);
      g_free(chr->opaque);
      chr->opaque = NULL;
      chr->chr_write = NULL;
@@ -2575,7 +2633,7 @@ void qemu_chr_close_mem(CharDriverState *chr)
  size_t qemu_chr_mem_osize(const CharDriverState *chr)
  {
      const MemoryDriver *d = chr->opaque;
-    return d->outbuf_size;
+    return d->cbuf_count;
  }
QemuOpts *qemu_chr_parse_compat(const char *label, const char *filename)
diff --git a/qemu-char.h b/qemu-char.h
index 486644b..d8d90cc 100644
--- a/qemu-char.h
+++ b/qemu-char.h
@@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ CharDriverState *qemu_chr_open_eventfd(int eventfd);
  extern int term_escape_char;
/* memory chardev */
-void qemu_chr_init_mem(CharDriverState *chr);
+void qemu_chr_init_mem(CharDriverState *chr, size_t size);
  void qemu_chr_close_mem(CharDriverState *chr);
  QString *qemu_chr_mem_to_qs(CharDriverState *chr);
  size_t qemu_chr_mem_osize(const CharDriverState *chr);
--
1.7.7.6


--
Lei




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]