qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] configure: some fixes for OpenBSD


From: Brad Smith
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] configure: some fixes for OpenBSD
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 08:15:20 -0400
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 02:02:57PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 24/08/2012 14:00, Brad Smith ha scritto:
> >>>>> > >> > OpenBSD's uname works as expected with the -s flag so remove the 
> >>>>> > >> > special
> >>>>> > >> > handling when determining the target OS. Use arch -s to retrieve 
> >>>>> > >> > the
> >>>>> > >> > hardware architecture as uname -m will return the meta 
> >>>>> > >> > architecture
> >>>>> > >> > instead of the hardware architecture (.e.g. macppc vs powerpc).
> >>> > > I'm afraid I think this patch is moving in the wrong direction.
> >>> > > Wherever possible we should be using compiler checks like 
> >>> > > check_define,
> >>> > > not looking at the output of 'uname' and the like. The former will
> >>> > > work when cross compiling, and the latter will give the wrong answers.
> >>> > > In some places we have that kind of 'look at uname/etc' check but
> >>> > > we should be trying to reduce and eliminate it where possible.
> >> > 
> >> > Right, we should support GNU triplets and a --host argument, and replace
> >> > uname checks with pattern matching on the triplet.
> > That still requires a means of generating that triplet in the first place.
> 
> That's what GNU config.guess is for, but it is only used in the
> non-cross-compilation case.  QEMU's homegrown configure hardly
> distinguishes between native and cross builds.

OK well if you're going in that direction that's fine as config.guess
knows how to do the right thing.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]