[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 01/21] target-s390x: fix style
From: |
Blue Swirl |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 01/21] target-s390x: fix style |
Date: |
Sat, 8 Sep 2012 08:09:13 +0000 |
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Alexander Graf <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> On 02.09.2012, at 13:33, Blue Swirl wrote:
>
>> Before splitting op_helper.c and helper.c in the next patches,
>> fix style issues. No functional changes.
>>
>> Replace also GCC specific __FUNCTION__ with
>> standard __func__.
>>
>> Don't init static variable (cpu_s390x_init:inited) with 0.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Blue Swirl <address@hidden>
>
> Thanks, applied [01-12] to s390-next.
Please send a pull request soon, as the first set in the series it is
blocking the rest.
>
>
> Alex
>
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/21] AREG0 patches, final round, Blue Swirl, 2012/09/02
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 03/21] target-s390x: split condition code helpers, Blue Swirl, 2012/09/02
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 02/21] target-s390x: split FPU ops, Blue Swirl, 2012/09/02
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 02/21] target-s390x: split FPU ops, Richard Henderson, 2012/09/04
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 02/21] target-s390x: split FPU ops, Blue Swirl, 2012/09/04
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 02/21] target-s390x: split FPU ops, Richard Henderson, 2012/09/04
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 02/21] target-s390x: split FPU ops, Alexander Graf, 2012/09/04
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 02/21] target-s390x: split FPU ops, Richard Henderson, 2012/09/05
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 02/21] target-s390x: split FPU ops, Alexander Graf, 2012/09/05
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 02/21] target-s390x: split FPU ops, Alexander Graf, 2012/09/06
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 02/21] target-s390x: split FPU ops, Richard Henderson, 2012/09/06