[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 04/25] ahci: add ide device initialization helpe
From: |
Jason Baron |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 04/25] ahci: add ide device initialization helper |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Sep 2012 13:59:52 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-12-10) |
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 10:15:39AM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Jason Baron <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 06:52:29PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> >> Jason Baron <address@hidden> writes:
> >>
> >> > On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 04:05:14PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> >> >> Jason Baron <address@hidden> writes:
> >> >>
> >> >> > From: Isaku Yamahata <address@hidden>
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Introduce a helper function which initializes the ahci port with
> >> >> > ide devices.
> >> >> > It will be used by q35 support.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Cc: Alexander Graf <address@hidden>
> >> >> > Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <address@hidden>
> >> >> > Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <address@hidden>
> >> >> > ---
> >> >> > hw/ide.h | 3 +++
> >> >> > hw/ide/ahci.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> >> >> > 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >> >> >
> >> >> > diff --git a/hw/ide.h b/hw/ide.h
> >> >> > index 2db4079..8df872e 100644
> >> >> > --- a/hw/ide.h
> >> >> > +++ b/hw/ide.h
> >> >> > @@ -36,4 +36,7 @@ int ide_get_bios_chs_trans(BusState *bus, int unit);
> >> >> > /* ide/core.c */
> >> >> > void ide_drive_get(DriveInfo **hd, int max_bus);
> >> >> >
> >> >> > +/* ide/ahci.c */
> >> >> > +void pci_ahci_ide_create_devs(PCIDevice *pci_dev, DriveInfo
> >> >> > **hd_table);
> >> >> > +
> >> >> > #endif /* HW_IDE_H */
> >> >> > diff --git a/hw/ide/ahci.c b/hw/ide/ahci.c
> >> >> > index 5ea3cad..9561210 100644
> >> >> > --- a/hw/ide/ahci.c
> >> >> > +++ b/hw/ide/ahci.c
> >> >> > @@ -1260,3 +1260,19 @@ static void sysbus_ahci_register_types(void)
> >> >> > }
> >> >> >
> >> >> > type_init(sysbus_ahci_register_types)
> >> >> > +
> >> >> > +void pci_ahci_ide_create_devs(PCIDevice *pci_dev, DriveInfo
> >> >> > **hd_table)
> >> >> > +{
> >> >> > + struct AHCIPCIState *dev = DO_UPCAST(struct AHCIPCIState, card,
> >> >> > pci_dev);
> >> >> > + int i;
> >> >> > +
> >> >> > + for (i = 0; i < dev->ahci.ports; i++) {
> >> >> > + /* master device only, ignore slaves */
> >> >> > + if (hd_table[i * MAX_IDE_DEVS] == NULL) {
> >> >> > + continue;
> >> >> > + }
> >> >> > + ide_create_drive(&dev->ahci.dev[i].port, 0,
> >> >> > + hd_table[i * MAX_IDE_DEVS]);
> >> >> > + }
> >> >> > +}
> >> >> > +
> >> >>
> >> >> Ignores odd entries in hd_table[] (MAX_IDE_DEVS is 2). Here's my
> >> >> attempt at explaining why.
> >> >>
> >> >> -drive has parameters bus, unit, and index. index and (bus, unit) are
> >> >> related in a well-known way that depends on parameter if. For if=ide,
> >> >> index = bus * 2 + unit. This relationship is ABI, i.e. it cannot be
> >> >> changed.
> >> >>
> >> >> "bus * 2 + unit" makes sense for IDE, because each IDE bus can connect
> >> >> two IDE devices, "master" and "slave".
> >> >>
> >> >> Boards implementing IDE reject drives with (bus, unit) that make no
> >> >> sense for the board's IDE controller(s). A typical board has a single
> >> >> controller with two buses, which means bus > 1 get rejected.
> >> >>
> >> >> q35 implements AHCI instead of IDE. It connects if=ide drives to AHCI,
> >> >> because that's felt to be convenient.
> >> >>
> >> >> An AHCI port can connect a single AHCI device, unlike an IDE bus. This
> >> >> patch identifies maps -drive's bus to AHCI port number.
> >> >>
> >> >> PATCH 11/25 sets up argument hd_table[] as follows:
> >> >>
> >> >> ide_drive_get(hd, MAX_SATA_PORTS);
> >> >>
> >> >> This rejects bus > MAX_SATA_PORTS. It doesn't reject unit == 1. I
> >> >> believe these get silently ignored. Bug or feature?
> >> >>
> >> >> Should we reject unit == 1 instead?
> >> >>
> >> >> Should we map -drive's index to AHCI port number instead?
> >> >
> >> > Right, so now that we have ide disks that can be attached to either the
> >> > legacy ide controller or to ahci, I think we need to differentiate which
> >> > controller we mean. That is, as proposed q35 is treating -drive if=ide
> >> > as an ide attached to the ahci controller. I think that is broken
> >> > behavior b/c we need a way to differentiate between the controllers.
> >>
> >> What exactly is broken?
> >>
> >
> > I think that -drive if=ide should result in a disk attached piix3-ide.
> > Not in an ide disk attached to the ahci controller (which is current q35
> > bahavior, and is 'broken' b/c we don't want that to change after q35 is
> > introdued). The reason being is that I think there should be an easy way
> > to create an ide drive on piix3-ide, and an ide drive on the ahci
> > controller. But it sounds like you don't agree with this point.
>
> Two issues with that:
>
> 1. Why should q35 have a piix3-ide? The ICH9 southbridge provides only
> SATA, so the board needs additional circuitry to provide PATA. As far
> as I can tell, intel's Q35 doesn't. ICH9-based boards that do certainly
> won't use a piix3-ide, because that's a *function* of the PIIX
> southbridge device. It doesn't exist separately.
>
> 2. Why should we connect -drive if=ide to a slow PATA controller instead
> of a perfectly servicable SATA controller?
>
The only way I can install windows xp, and various bsd flavors at the
momemnt is by using the PATA controller.
> >> > As Alexander Graf has proposed before, I think we need a -drive if=ahci
> >> > introduced. In that case, I think we reject unit > 0, as you've
> >> > suggested.
> >>
> >> Achieved by setting if_max_devs[IF_AHCI] to one. bus becomes an alias
> >> for index, and unit must be zero.
> >>
> >> Alternatively, keep if_max_devs[IF_AHCI] zero. Swaps role of bus and
> >> unit.
> >>
> >> Alex had if_max_devs[IF_AHCI] = 6.
> >>
> >> > In terms of the current q35 patch series, I think the first step would
> >> > be to introduce the ahci interface type, and have hda-hdd be added with
> >> > the default type for q35 of ahci. Then, we can simply fetch ahci drives
> >> > of index 0-3, and populate the controller, without any of this skipping
> >> > odd numbers stuff.
> >> >
> >> > The next step would then to add if=ahci interface to -drive.
> >>
> >> We discussed if=ahci at length before, without reaching consensus. I'd
> >> rather not rehash the old arguments again. Instead, let's examine how
> >> the command line should behave, and only then figure out how to get
> >> that.
> >>
> >> 1. Drives created with -hd[a-d], -cdrom, or the non-option image
> >> argument should connect to well-known connectors of the board's
> >> preferred controller.
> >>
> >> For current pc, the preferred controller is piix3-ide. -hda connects
> >> to its primary bus as master, -hdb as slave. -hdc connects to its
> >> secondary bus as master, -hdd as slave.
> >>
> >> For pseries, the preferred controller is spapr-vscsi. -hda connects
> >> as SCSI ID 0, -hdb as 1, and so forth.
> >>
> >> For s390-virtio, the preferred controller is virtio-blk-s390. -hda
> >> and -hdb connect to their own virtio-blk-s390 controller, -hdc and
> >> -hdd get silently ignored. Yes, that's wacky. Your current q35
> >> patch is similarly wacky, as far as I can tell: -hdb and -hdd get
> >> silently ignored.
> >>
> >> For q35, the preferred controller is ich9-ahci. I'd expect -hda to
> >> connect to port 0, -hdb to port 1, and so forth.
> >>
> >> Below the hood, -hda is currently like -drive index=0,media=disk,
> >> -hd[b-d] same with index=1..3, and -cdrom is like -drive
> >> index=2,media=cdrom, independent of the board.
> >>
> >> It follows that -cdrom connects to the same connector as -hdc for all
> >> boards. Fine for pc, but may not be as fine for some other boards.
> >> You can't use both -hdc and -cdrom at the same time.
> >>
> >> The non-option image argument is equivalent to -hda. You can't use
> >> both at the same time.
> >>
> >> 2. Drives created with -drive without if, index, bus, and unit connect
> >> to the next unused connector of the board's preferred controller.
> >>
> >> If all connectors are in use, behavior currently depends on the
> >> board, I think.
> >>
> >> 3. -drive parameters (if, index) provide more control over the connector
> >> to use.
> >>
> >> Which controller you get for which if depends on the board. So does
> >> the meaning of index. The details can get messy.
> >>
> >> For instance, drives with (if, index) the board doesn't support
> >> sometimes get ignored silently, and sometimes get flagged as error.
> >>
> >> Currently, -drive without parameter if is equivalent to either if=ide
> >> or if=scsi. Could be changed for new machine types.
> >>
> >> For q35, -drive index=0..5 should connect to ports 0..5 of the
> >> board's ich9-ahci.
> >>
> >> 4. -drive parameters (bus, unit) are an alternate way to specify
> >> parameter index. The mapping between index and (bus, unit) depends
> >> on the board.
> >>
> >> Actually, it depends only on parameter if right now. For if=ide,
> >> index = bus * 2 + unit, unit<2. For if=scsi, index = bus * 7 + unit,
> >> unit < 7. For everything else, index = unit, bus = 0. We might want
> >> to make it depend on the board, see commit 27d6bf40.
> >>
> >> For q35, we want index = bus * 6 + unit, unit<5.
> >>
> >> An easy way to get that is new if=ahci. Backfires when an AHCI
> >> controller with a different number of ports shows up.
> >>
> >
> > I agree with points 1-4.
> >
> >> We really should make the mapping between index and (bus, unit)
> >> depend on the board. And then we can just as well use if=ide to
> >> refer to q35's one and only IDE-like controller ich9-ahci.
> >
> > I agree mapping should depend on the board.
>
> We agree on the important things then.
>
> > But I'm not sure about using if=ide to use ich9-ahci. I'm suggesting
> > that if=ide should continue to refer to piix3-ide.
>
> Perhaps it should mean "the board's preferred ATA controller", perhaps
> it should mean "the board's preferred PATA controller". Certainly
> debatable.
>
> If the latter, not necessarily piix3-ide.
>
Sure. My main point was that 'if=ide' in the q35 context doesn't specify a SATA
controller. I think it would be nice to have a short hand way of specify both
PATA and SATA on q35.
Thanks,
-Jason
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 06/25] pc: Move ioapic_init() from pc_piix.c to pc.c, (continued)
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 06/25] pc: Move ioapic_init() from pc_piix.c to pc.c, Jason Baron, 2012/09/13
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 13/25] q35: Suppress SMM BIOS initialization under KVM, Jason Baron, 2012/09/13
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 03/25] pci: introduce pci_swizzle_map_irq_fn() for standardized interrupt pin swizzle, Jason Baron, 2012/09/13
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 04/25] ahci: add ide device initialization helper, Jason Baron, 2012/09/13
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 04/25] ahci: add ide device initialization helper, Markus Armbruster, 2012/09/21
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 04/25] ahci: add ide device initialization helper, Jason Baron, 2012/09/21
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 04/25] ahci: add ide device initialization helper, Markus Armbruster, 2012/09/24
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 04/25] ahci: add ide device initialization helper, Jason Baron, 2012/09/24
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 04/25] ahci: add ide device initialization helper, Markus Armbruster, 2012/09/26
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 04/25] ahci: add ide device initialization helper, Kevin Wolf, 2012/09/26
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 04/25] ahci: add ide device initialization helper,
Jason Baron <=
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH 15/25] q35: smbus: Remove PCI_STATUS_SIG_SYSTEM_ERROR and PCI_STATUS_DETECTED_PARITY from w1cmask, Jason Baron, 2012/09/13
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH 09/25] pcie: pass pcie window size to pcie_host_mmcfg_update(), Jason Baron, 2012/09/13
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH 17/25] q35: Add kvmclock support, Jason Baron, 2012/09/13
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH 14/25] q35: Fix non-PCI IRQ processing in ich9_lpc_update_apic, Jason Baron, 2012/09/13
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH 20/25] pcie: drop version_id field for live migration, Jason Baron, 2012/09/13
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH 25/25] q35: automatically load the q35 dsdt table, Jason Baron, 2012/09/13
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH 22/25] ahci: properly reset PxCMD on HBA reset, Jason Baron, 2012/09/13