[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] getting rid of coroutine-gthread?
From: |
Brad Smith |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] getting rid of coroutine-gthread? |
Date: |
Sat, 12 Jan 2013 04:07:12 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 07:24:35PM +0100, Andreas F?rber wrote:
> Am 11.01.2013 19:11, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
> > Brad and Peter,
> >
> > as far as I know OpenBSD and Linux/ARM were the main users of
> > coroutine-gthread. Do you think we could dump it and rely on
> > coroutine-sigaltstack only? The differences in signal handling of the
> > gthread implementation always worried me.
> >
> > What versions of OpenBSD would we have to drop support for? Is that
> > acceptable to you?
>
> No, I believe there is explicit code in configure to force the GThread
> implementation on Mac OS X.
That is to skip over testing for the ucontext implementation. There was
a build issue with the sigaltstack implementation but it was fixed
relatively recently.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.