Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-1.4? qom-cpu-next 1/9] target-s390x: Drop unused cpu_s390x_close() prototype

[Alexander Graf]

On 15.02.2013, at 18:44, Andreas Färber wrote:

> Alex,
> 
> Am 02.02.2013 12:57, schrieb Andreas Färber:
>> It was never implemented.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <address@hidden>
> 
> Too late for 1.4 now obviously. ;)
> 
> Do you want to queue this on s390-next (i.e.,do you plan an early pull)?
> Or should I put it in qom-cpu-next?

Just put it into qom-cpu-next :)


Alex

> 
> The remainder of the series is waiting on my VMState series, which seems
> unlikely to go into qom-cpu-next before the merge window.
> 
> Andreas
> 
>> ---
>> target-s390x/cpu.h |    1 -
>> 1 Datei geändert, 1 Zeile entfernt(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/target-s390x/cpu.h b/target-s390x/cpu.h
>> index 01e59b9..0070c40 100644
>> --- a/target-s390x/cpu.h
>> +++ b/target-s390x/cpu.h
>> @@ -315,7 +315,6 @@ static inline int get_ilen(uint8_t opc)
>> S390CPU *cpu_s390x_init(const char *cpu_model);
>> void s390x_translate_init(void);
>> int cpu_s390x_exec(CPUS390XState *s);
>> -void cpu_s390x_close(CPUS390XState *s);
>> void do_interrupt (CPUS390XState *env);
>> 
>> /* you can call this signal handler from your SIGBUS and SIGSEGV
> 
> -- 
> SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
> GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg