qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/9] target-i386: convert 'hv_relaxed' to static


From: Andreas Färber
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/9] target-i386: convert 'hv_relaxed' to static property
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 21:19:18 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130105 Thunderbird/17.0.2

Am 19.02.2013 19:45, schrieb Eduardo Habkost:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 05:35:06PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <address@hidden>
>> ---
>>  target-i386/cpu.c |   35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>  1 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/target-i386/cpu.c b/target-i386/cpu.c
>> index 1f14b65..b804031 100644
>> --- a/target-i386/cpu.c
>> +++ b/target-i386/cpu.c
>> @@ -528,6 +528,38 @@ PropertyInfo qdev_prop_spinlocks = {
>>      .defval = _defval                                                       
>>    \
>>  }
>>  
>> +static void x86_get_hv_relaxed(Object *obj, Visitor *v, void *opaque,
>> +                                 const char *name, Error **errp)
>> +{
>> +    bool value = hyperv_relaxed_timing_enabled();
>> +
>> +    visit_type_bool(v, &value, name, errp);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void x86_set_hv_relaxed(Object *obj, Visitor *v, void *opaque,
>> +                                 const char *name, Error **errp)
>> +{
>> +    bool value;
>> +
>> +    visit_type_bool(v, &value, name, errp);
>> +    if (error_is_set(errp)) {
>> +        return;
>> +    }
>> +    hyperv_enable_relaxed_timing(value);
>> +}
>> +
>> +PropertyInfo qdev_prop_hv_relaxed = {
>> +    .name  = "boolean",
>> +    .get   = x86_get_hv_relaxed,
>> +    .set   = x86_set_hv_relaxed,
>> +};
>> +#define DEFINE_PROP_HV_RELAXED(_n, _defval) {                               
>>    \
>> +    .name  = _n,                                                            
>>    \
>> +    .info  = &qdev_prop_hv_relaxed,                                         
>>    \
>> +    .qtype = QTYPE_QBOOL,                                                   
>>    \
>> +    .defval = _defval                                                       
>>    \
>> +}
>> +
>>  static Property cpu_x86_properties[] = {
>>      DEFINE_PROP_FAMILY("family"),
>>      DEFINE_PROP_MODEL("model"),
>> @@ -538,6 +570,7 @@ static Property cpu_x86_properties[] = {
>>      DEFINE_PROP_MODEL_ID("model-id"),
>>      DEFINE_PROP_TSC_FREQ("tsc-frequency"),
>>      DEFINE_PROP_HV_SPINLOCKS("hv-spinlocks", HYPERV_SPINLOCK_NEVER_RETRY),
>> +    DEFINE_PROP_HV_RELAXED("hv-relaxed", false),
> 
> Why not simply make it a X86CPU struct field, so we don't need a special
> PropertyInfo?
> 
> The whole contents of target-i386/hyperv.c are getters/setters for three
> static variables that should have been X86CPU fields in the first place.

Note that I intentionally did not make them properties because of that.
If the setting is not per CPU, it should not be set through X86CPU.
I don't know whether it would make sense to make these tunable per CPU?

Andreas

-- 
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]