qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom-cpu 6/9] target-i386: Add "feature-words" pr


From: Igor Mammedov
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom-cpu 6/9] target-i386: Add "feature-words" property
Date: Fri, 3 May 2013 13:34:23 +0200

On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 16:00:17 -0300
Eduardo Habkost <address@hidden> wrote:

> This property will be useful for libvirt, as libvirt already has logic
> based on low-level feature bits (not feature names), so it will be
> really easy to convert the current libvirt logic to something using the
> "feature-words" property.
> 
> The property will have two main use cases:
>  - Checking host capabilities, by checking the features of the "host"
>    CPU model
>  - Checking which features are enabled on each CPU model

patch doesn't apply to current qom-cpu, more comments below.

> 
> Example output:
> 
>   $ ./QMP/qmp --path=/tmp/m qom-get --path=/machine/unattached/device[1] 
> --property=feature-words
>   item[0].cpuid-register: EDX
>   item[0].cpuid-input-eax: 2147483658
>   item[0].features: 0
>   item[1].cpuid-register: EAX
>   item[1].cpuid-input-eax: 1073741825
>   item[1].features: 0
>   item[2].cpuid-register: EDX
>   item[2].cpuid-input-eax: 3221225473
>   item[2].features: 0
>   item[3].cpuid-register: ECX
>   item[3].cpuid-input-eax: 2147483649
>   item[3].features: 101
>   item[4].cpuid-register: EDX
>   item[4].cpuid-input-eax: 2147483649
>   item[4].features: 563346425
>   item[5].cpuid-register: EBX
>   item[5].cpuid-input-eax: 7
>   item[5].features: 0
>   item[5].cpuid-input-ecx: 0
could item be represented as CPUID function in format used in Intel's SDM?

item[5].CPUID: EAX=7h,ECX=0h
item[5].EBX: 0
item[5].EAX: 0

for simplicity/uniformity ECX could be not optional, always present, and
ignored when not needed.
 
>   item[6].cpuid-register: ECX
>   item[6].cpuid-input-eax: 1
>   item[6].features: 2155880449
>   item[7].cpuid-register: EDX
>   item[7].cpuid-input-eax: 1
>   item[7].features: 126614521
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <address@hidden>
> ---
> Changes v1 -> v2:
>  * Merge the non-qapi and qapi patches, to keep series simpler
>  * Use the feature word array series as base, so we don't have
>    to set the feature word values one-by-one in the code
>  * Change type name of property from "x86-cpu-feature-words" to
>    "X86CPUFeatureWordInfo"
>  * Remove cpu-qapi-schema.json and simply add the type definitions
>    to qapi-schema.json, to keep the changes simpler
>    * This required compiling qapi-types.o and qapi-visit.o into
>      *-user as well
> ---
>  .gitignore        |  2 ++
>  Makefile.objs     |  7 +++++-
>  qapi-schema.json  | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  target-i386/cpu.c | 70 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>  4 files changed, 97 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
> index 487813a..71408e3 100644
> --- a/.gitignore
> +++ b/.gitignore
> @@ -21,6 +21,8 @@ linux-headers/asm
>  qapi-generated
>  qapi-types.[ch]
>  qapi-visit.[ch]
> +cpu-qapi-types.[ch]
> +cpu-qapi-visit.[ch]
still needed?

>  qmp-commands.h
>  qmp-marshal.c
>  qemu-doc.html
> diff --git a/Makefile.objs b/Makefile.objs
> index a473348..1835d37 100644
> --- a/Makefile.objs
> +++ b/Makefile.objs
> @@ -78,10 +78,15 @@ common-obj-$(CONFIG_SMARTCARD_NSS) += $(libcacard-y)
>  ######################################################################
>  # qapi
>  
> -common-obj-y += qmp-marshal.o qapi-visit.o qapi-types.o
> +common-obj-y += qmp-marshal.o
>  common-obj-y += qmp.o hmp.o
>  endif
>  
> +######################################################################
> +# some qapi visitors are used by both system and user emulation:
> +
> +common-obj-y += qapi-visit.o qapi-types.o
> +
>  #######################################################################
>  # Target-independent parts used in system and user emulation
>  common-obj-y += qemu-log.o
> diff --git a/qapi-schema.json b/qapi-schema.json
> index 751d3c2..424434f 100644
> --- a/qapi-schema.json
> +++ b/qapi-schema.json
> @@ -3505,3 +3505,34 @@
>      '*asl_compiler_rev':  'uint32',
>      '*file':              'str',
>      '*data':              'str' }}
> +
> +# @X86CPURegister32
> +#
> +# A X86 32-bit register
> +#
> +# Since: 1.5
> +##
> +{ 'enum': 'X86CPURegister32',
> +  'data': [ 'EAX', 'EBX', 'ECX', 'EDX', 'ESP', 'EBP', 'ESI', 'EDI' ] }
> +
> +##
> +# @X86CPUFeatureWordInfo
> +#
> +# Information about a X86 CPU feature word
> +#
> +# @cpuid-input-eax: Input EAX value for CPUID instruction for that feature 
> word
> +#
> +# @cpuid-input-ecx: #optional Input ECX value for CPUID instruction for that
> +#                   feature word
> +#
> +# @cpuid-register: Output register containing the feature bits
> +#
> +# @features: value of output register, containing the feature bits
> +#
> +# Since: 1.5
> +##
> +{ 'type': 'X86CPUFeatureWordInfo',
> +  'data': { 'cpuid-input-eax': 'int',
> +            '*cpuid-input-ecx': 'int',
> +            'cpuid-register': 'X86CPURegister32',
> +            'features': 'int' } }
> diff --git a/target-i386/cpu.c b/target-i386/cpu.c
> index 314931e..757749c 100644
> --- a/target-i386/cpu.c
> +++ b/target-i386/cpu.c
> @@ -30,6 +30,8 @@
>  #include "qemu/config-file.h"
>  #include "qapi/qmp/qerror.h"
>  
> +#include "qapi-types.h"
> +#include "qapi-visit.h"
>  #include "qapi/visitor.h"
>  #include "sysemu/arch_init.h"
>  
> @@ -194,23 +196,34 @@ static FeatureWordInfo feature_word_info[FEATURE_WORDS] 
> = {
>      },
>  };
>  
> +typedef struct X86RegisterInfo32 {
> +    /* Name of register */
> +    const char *name;
> +    /* QAPI enum value register */
> +    X86CPURegister32 qapi_enum;
> +} X86RegisterInfo32;
> +
> +#define REGISTER(reg) \
> +    [R_##reg] = { .name = #reg, .qapi_enum = X86_C_P_U_REGISTER32_##reg }
                                                ^^^^
Using auto-generated names like this probably is very fragile.

> +X86RegisterInfo32 x86_reg_info_32[CPU_NB_REGS32] = {
> +    REGISTER(EAX),
> +    REGISTER(ECX),
> +    REGISTER(EDX),
> +    REGISTER(EBX),
> +    REGISTER(ESP),
> +    REGISTER(EBP),
> +    REGISTER(ESI),
> +    REGISTER(EDI),
> +};
> +#undef REGISTER
> +
> +
>  const char *get_register_name_32(unsigned int reg)
>  {
> -    static const char *reg_names[CPU_NB_REGS32] = {
> -        [R_EAX] = "EAX",
> -        [R_ECX] = "ECX",
> -        [R_EDX] = "EDX",
> -        [R_EBX] = "EBX",
> -        [R_ESP] = "ESP",
> -        [R_EBP] = "EBP",
> -        [R_ESI] = "ESI",
> -        [R_EDI] = "EDI",
> -    };
> -
>      if (reg > CPU_NB_REGS32) {
>          return NULL;
>      }
> -    return reg_names[reg];
> +    return x86_reg_info_32[reg].name;
>  }
>  
>  /* collects per-function cpuid data
> @@ -1360,6 +1373,36 @@ static void x86_cpuid_set_tsc_freq(Object *obj, 
> Visitor *v, void *opaque,
>      cpu->env.tsc_khz = value / 1000;
>  }
>  
> +static void x86_cpu_get_feature_words(Object *obj, Visitor *v, void *opaque,
> +                                   const char *name, Error **errp)
> +{
> +    X86CPU *cpu = X86_CPU(obj);
> +    CPUX86State *env = &cpu->env;
> +    FeatureWord w;
> +    Error *err = NULL;
> +    X86CPUFeatureWordInfo word_infos[FEATURE_WORDS] = { };
> +    X86CPUFeatureWordInfoList list_entries[FEATURE_WORDS] = { };
> +    X86CPUFeatureWordInfoList *list = NULL;
> +
> +    for (w = 0; w < FEATURE_WORDS; w++) {
> +        FeatureWordInfo *wi = &feature_word_info[w];
> +        X86CPUFeatureWordInfo *qwi = &word_infos[w];
> +        qwi->cpuid_input_eax = wi->cpuid_eax;
> +        qwi->has_cpuid_input_ecx = wi->cpuid_needs_ecx;
> +        qwi->cpuid_input_ecx = wi->cpuid_ecx;
> +        qwi->cpuid_register = x86_reg_info_32[wi->cpuid_reg].qapi_enum;
Is there way not to use qapi_enum at all and use name instead?

> +        qwi->features = env->features[w];
> +
> +        /* List will be in reverse order, but order shouldn't matter */
> +        list_entries[w].next = list;
> +        list_entries[w].value = &word_infos[w];
list_entries[w].value = qwi;

> +        list = &list_entries[w];
> +    }
> +
> +    visit_type_X86CPUFeatureWordInfoList(v, &list, "feature-words", &err);
> +    error_propagate(errp, err);
> +}
> +
>  static int cpu_x86_find_by_name(x86_def_t *x86_cpu_def, const char *name)
>  {
>      x86_def_t *def;
> @@ -2348,6 +2391,9 @@ static void x86_cpu_initfn(Object *obj)
>      object_property_add(obj, "tsc-frequency", "int",
>                          x86_cpuid_get_tsc_freq,
>                          x86_cpuid_set_tsc_freq, NULL, NULL, NULL);
> +    object_property_add(obj, "feature-words", "X86CPUFeatureWordInfo",
> +                        x86_cpu_get_feature_words,
> +                        NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL);
>  
>      env->cpuid_apic_id = x86_cpu_apic_id_from_index(cs->cpu_index);
>  
> -- 
> 1.8.1.4
> 
> 


-- 
Regards,
  Igor



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]