On 4 May 2013 09:27, Andreas Färber <address@hidden> wrote:
Am 04.05.2013 10:22, schrieb Jean-Christophe DUBOIS:
Do you mean arm_load_kernel() should test for qtest_enable() or should I
call arm_load_kernel() only if !qtest_enable() (there is not much
platform checking for qtest_enable() at this time and it seems somebody
need to set the "entry" field in the info struct).
In short, qtest does not execute any code, so it does not need to load
binaries or set CPU entry addresses.
Yes, I would say there is no point calling arm_load_kernel() if
!qtest_enabled().
I'd rather we didn't end up with qtest_enabled() checks infecting
every board model, please...