qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/8] Add virtio-mmio and use it in vexpress


From: Peter Maydell
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/8] Add virtio-mmio and use it in vexpress
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 15:06:38 +0100

On 8 July 2013 14:45, Alexander Graf <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 08.07.2013, at 15:23, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> Now I'm completely confused. Why would assigned devices
>> have anything to do with this? Can you explain in more
>> detail, because I don't really see what you're suggesting?
>
> The only missing link we have to create any device using -device
> on the command line is the IRQ line enumeration. If we can allocate
> IRQ lines automatically, we can put any command line given -device
> onto our main system bus that is non-pci, non-isa.

If the user is expected to be able to get the MMIO address
right (which they'd have to specify on the command line
somehow too) why not require them to specify the IRQ number
while they're doing it? I'm a bit suspicious of anything
that requires the user to specify to that level of detail
though, since it requires a lot of inside knowledge about the
board.

This is the whole reason for having the separate transport:
the board gets to take care of the board specific detail of
how to wire up the transport, and the user just asks to
create the backends that plug automatically into it.
The virtio command line options are complicated and confusing
enough as it is.

> So if we want to ever support VFIO for platform devices,
> the user will want to pass -device vfio-ahci,foo=bar on
> the command line to assign an AHCI device.

This appears to be seriously short on actually specifying
enough information to wire a device up.

> The only infrastructure blocker we have for that today
> is the IRQ allocation.

DMA lines? Specifying the right location in the address space?

> Maybe we could even try to be as smart as putting the MMIO
> regions into guest address space intelligently automatically.

This sounds likely to cause problems with migration unless
we can guarantee that we always pick the same place.

-- PMM



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]