qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom-next v2 3/5] target-arm: Use parent classes


From: Andreas Färber
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom-next v2 3/5] target-arm: Use parent classes for reset + realize
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 12:36:42 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7

Am 11.07.2013 12:31, schrieb Michael S. Tsirkin:
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 11:47:59AM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
>> On Thu, 11 Jul 2013 11:47:16 +1000
>> address@hidden wrote:
>>
>>> From: Peter Crosthwaite <address@hidden>
>>>
>>> ARMCPUClass is only needed for parent-class abstract function access.
>>> Just use parent classes for reset and realize access and remove
>>> ARMCPUClass completely.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Peter Crosthwaite <address@hidden>
>>> ---
>>>
>>>  target-arm/cpu-qom.h | 20 --------------------
>>>  target-arm/cpu.c     | 16 +++++++---------
>>>  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/target-arm/cpu-qom.h b/target-arm/cpu-qom.h
>>> index ef6261f..bdad93a 100644
>>> --- a/target-arm/cpu-qom.h
>>> +++ b/target-arm/cpu-qom.h
>>> @@ -24,28 +24,8 @@
>>>  
>>>  #define TYPE_ARM_CPU "arm-cpu"
>>>  
>>> -#define ARM_CPU_CLASS(klass) \
>>> -    OBJECT_CLASS_CHECK(ARMCPUClass, (klass), TYPE_ARM_CPU)
>>>  #define ARM_CPU(obj) \
>>>      OBJECT_CHECK(ARMCPU, (obj), TYPE_ARM_CPU)
>>> -#define ARM_CPU_GET_CLASS(obj) \
>>> -    OBJECT_GET_CLASS(ARMCPUClass, (obj), TYPE_ARM_CPU)
>>> -
>>> -/**
>>> - * ARMCPUClass:
>>> - * @parent_realize: The parent class' realize handler.
>>> - * @parent_reset: The parent class' reset handler.
>>> - *
>>> - * An ARM CPU model.
>>> - */
>>> -typedef struct ARMCPUClass {
>>> -    /*< private >*/
>>> -    CPUClass parent_class;
>>> -    /*< public >*/
>>> -
>>> -    DeviceRealize parent_realize;
>>> -    void (*parent_reset)(CPUState *cpu);
>>> -} ARMCPUClass;
>>>  
>>>  /**
>>>   * ARMCPU:
>>> diff --git a/target-arm/cpu.c b/target-arm/cpu.c
>>> index ed53df8..ad5ec7b 100644
>>> --- a/target-arm/cpu.c
>>> +++ b/target-arm/cpu.c
>>> @@ -60,7 +60,8 @@ static void cp_reg_reset(gpointer key, gpointer value, 
>>> gpointer opaque)
>>>  static void arm_cpu_reset(CPUState *s)
>>>  {
>>>      ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(s);
>>> -    ARMCPUClass *acc = ARM_CPU_GET_CLASS(cpu);
>>> +    CPUClass *cc_parent =
>>> +            CPU_CLASS(object_class_get_parent_by_name(TYPE_ARM_CPU));
>> Maybe object_class_get_parent_of_type() would be less confusing?
>>
>> This usage assumes that parent of TYPE_ARM_CPU is TYPE_CPU and if
>> another TYPE_X added between them, it might break if TYPE_X doesn't
>> re-implement this logic in its reset.
> 
> If what's needed is TYPE_CPU, you can just look up the class by name.

My suggestion was to hide the implementation details behind an
ARM_CPU_GET_PARENT_CLASS(obj) macro.

That would at the same time allow to later switch to an iterative
approach as seen in v1 without a whole lot of refactoring.

Andreas

> 
>> Could reset be modeled like DEVICE.instance_init() instead? Then
>> no explicit access to parent from child would be needed and it
>> still leaves possibility to override resets if parent->child
>> propagation order is not desirable for a particular device.
>>
>>>      CPUARMState *env = &cpu->env;
>>>  
>>>      if (qemu_loglevel_mask(CPU_LOG_RESET)) {
>>> @@ -68,7 +69,7 @@ static void arm_cpu_reset(CPUState *s)
>>>          log_cpu_state(env, 0);
>>>      }
>>>  
>>> -    acc->parent_reset(s);
>>> +    cc_parent->reset(s);
>>>  
>>>      memset(env, 0, offsetof(CPUARMState, breakpoints));
>>>      g_hash_table_foreach(cpu->cp_regs, cp_reg_reset, cpu);
>>> @@ -158,7 +159,8 @@ static void arm_cpu_finalizefn(Object *obj)
>>>  static void arm_cpu_realizefn(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
>>>  {
>>>      ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(dev);
>>> -    ARMCPUClass *acc = ARM_CPU_GET_CLASS(dev);
>>> +    DeviceClass *dc_parent =
>>> +            DEVICE_CLASS(object_class_get_parent_by_name(TYPE_ARM_CPU));
>>>      CPUARMState *env = &cpu->env;
>>>  
>>>      /* Some features automatically imply others: */
>>> @@ -209,7 +211,7 @@ static void arm_cpu_realizefn(DeviceState *dev, Error 
>>> **errp)
>>>  
>>>      cpu_reset(CPU(cpu));
>>>  
>>> -    acc->parent_realize(dev, errp);
>>> +    dc_parent->realize(dev, errp);
>>>  }
>>>  
>>>  /* CPU models */
>>> @@ -803,14 +805,11 @@ static const ARMCPUInfo arm_cpus[] = {
>>>  
>>>  static void arm_cpu_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
>>>  {
>>> -    ARMCPUClass *acc = ARM_CPU_CLASS(oc);
>>> -    CPUClass *cc = CPU_CLASS(acc);
>>> +    CPUClass *cc = CPU_CLASS(oc);
>>>      DeviceClass *dc = DEVICE_CLASS(oc);
>>>  
>>> -    acc->parent_realize = dc->realize;
>>>      dc->realize = arm_cpu_realizefn;
>>>  
>>> -    acc->parent_reset = cc->reset;
>>>      cc->reset = arm_cpu_reset;
>>>  
>>>      cc->class_by_name = arm_cpu_class_by_name;
>>> @@ -839,7 +838,6 @@ static const TypeInfo arm_cpu_type_info = {
>>>      .instance_init = arm_cpu_initfn,
>>>      .instance_finalize = arm_cpu_finalizefn,
>>>      .abstract = true,
>>> -    .class_size = sizeof(ARMCPUClass),
>>>      .class_init = arm_cpu_class_init,
>>>  };
>>>  


-- 
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]