qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 15/19] block: use bdrv_has_zero_init to retur


From: Kevin Wolf
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 15/19] block: use bdrv_has_zero_init to return BDRV_BLOCK_ZERO
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 11:16:09 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

Am 25.07.2013 um 16:23 hat Paolo Bonzini geschrieben:
> Alternatively, this could use a "discard zeroes data" flag returned
> by bdrv_get_info.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <address@hidden>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden>
> ---
>  block.c | 8 +++++++-
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block.c b/block.c
> index 7cfbf71..fc1da56 100644
> --- a/block.c
> +++ b/block.c
> @@ -2991,6 +2991,7 @@ static int64_t coroutine_fn 
> bdrv_co_get_block_status(BlockDriverState *bs,
>                                                       int nb_sectors, int 
> *pnum)
>  {
>      int64_t n;
> +    int64_t ret;
>  
>      if (sector_num >= bs->total_sectors) {
>          *pnum = 0;
> @@ -3007,7 +3008,12 @@ static int64_t coroutine_fn 
> bdrv_co_get_block_status(BlockDriverState *bs,
>          return BDRV_BLOCK_DATA;
>      }
>  
> -    return bs->drv->bdrv_co_get_block_status(bs, sector_num, nb_sectors, 
> pnum);
> +    ret = bs->drv->bdrv_co_get_block_status(bs, sector_num, nb_sectors, 
> pnum);

I think here you should check for ret < 0 before modifying bits.

> +    if (!(ret & BDRV_BLOCK_DATA) && bdrv_has_zero_init(bs)) {
> +        ret |= BDRV_BLOCK_ZERO;
> +    }
> +
> +    return ret;
>  }

Kevin



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]