[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] rbd: avoid qemu_rbd_snap_list() memory leak whe
From: |
Kevin Wolf |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] rbd: avoid qemu_rbd_snap_list() memory leak when no snapshots |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Sep 2013 10:06:11 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
Am 25.09.2013 um 02:28 hat Michael Roth geschrieben:
> Quoting Stefan Hajnoczi (2013-08-14 07:13:52)
> > When there are no snapshots qemu_rbd_snap_list() returns 0 and the
> > snapshot table pointer is NULL. Don't forget to free the snaps buffer
> > we allocated for librbd rbd_snap_list().
> >
> > Cc: address@hidden
> > Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <address@hidden>
>
> Ping for 1.6.1
Applied it to the block branch for now, but...
> > ---
> > block/rbd.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/block/rbd.c b/block/rbd.c
> > index cb71751..4e26fea 100644
> > --- a/block/rbd.c
> > +++ b/block/rbd.c
> > @@ -934,7 +934,7 @@ static int qemu_rbd_snap_list(BlockDriverState *bs,
> > do {
> > snaps = g_malloc(sizeof(*snaps) * max_snaps);
> > snap_count = rbd_snap_list(s->image, snaps, &max_snaps);
> > - if (snap_count < 0) {
> > + if (snap_count <= 0) {
> > g_free(snaps);
> > }
> > } while (snap_count == -ERANGE);
...I think this isn't a complete fix. In the successful case we still
leak snaps. The g_free() should probably be moved to after the done:
label in a v2 of the patch.
Kevin