[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] Which functions of southbridges should be no-user?
|
From: |
Markus Armbruster |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] Which functions of southbridges should be no-user? |
|
Date: |
Wed, 16 Oct 2013 11:58:11 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) |
Andreas Färber <address@hidden> writes:
> Am 15.10.2013 16:41, schrieb Kevin Wolf:
>> having two IDE controllers using the same I/O ports won't work,
>> obviously. So if you would allow -device or device-add for them, you'd
>> need options to configure the ports at least.
>
> Or a new can_only_be_instantiated_once flag. :)
> Or proper error handling to have it fail gracefully at least.
can_only_be_instantiated_once helps users only in special cases of the
general resource conflict problem. Proper handling of resource
conflicts helps them always.
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 7/9] vt82c686: Document why cannot_instantiate_with_device_add_yet, (continued)
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 7/9] vt82c686: Document why cannot_instantiate_with_device_add_yet, armbru, 2013/10/10
- [Qemu-devel] Why is TYPE_CPU no-user? (was: [PATCH RFC 0/9] Clean up and fix no_user), Markus Armbruster, 2013/10/15
- [Qemu-devel] Which functions of southbridges should be no-user? (was: [PATCH RFC 0/9] Clean up and fix no_user), Markus Armbruster, 2013/10/15
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Which functions of southbridges should be no-user?, Andreas Färber, 2013/10/15
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Which functions of southbridges should be no-user?, Anthony Liguori, 2013/10/15
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Which functions of southbridges should be no-user?, Markus Armbruster, 2013/10/16
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Which functions of southbridges should be no-user?, Andreas Färber, 2013/10/16
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Which functions of southbridges should be no-user?, Markus Armbruster, 2013/10/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Which functions of southbridges should be no-user?, Anthony Liguori, 2013/10/16
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Which functions of southbridges should be no-user?, Markus Armbruster, 2013/10/17